Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39506501›Full record

ArticleHealth expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy2024

Knowledge Families Hold: Co-Production and Co-Research With Mental Health Family Carers in Understanding Experiences During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

Caroline Walters, Eileen McDonald, Carli Sheers, Kerry Hawkins, Hayley Solich, JulieAnne Anderson, Nevena Simic, Danielle Moore, Tony Stevenson, Sharon Lawn and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Co-Production With Mental Health Family Carers: The Value, Outcomes and Benefits for Family Carers and Academic Researchers.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Caroline WaltersDepartment of Social Work, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-8770-7695
Eileen McDonaldNational Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Carli SheersNational Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.ORCID 0009-0009-9920-9085
Kerry HawkinsNational Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Hayley SolichNational Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
JulieAnne AndersonNational Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Nevena SimicEmbrace Multicultural Mental Health, Canberra, Australian Capital Territory, Australia.
Danielle MooreHelping Minds, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Tony StevensonMental Illness Fellowship of Australia, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.
Sharon LawnLived Experience Australia, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5464-8887
Melinda GoodyearSchool of Rural Health, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5928-0161
Marcelo MaghidmanDepartment of Social Work, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-2040-055X
Melissa PetrakisDepartment of Social Work, Monash University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4885-932X

Funding

This research was supported the Mental Health Australia, through a grant from the National Mental Health Commission, Australia, to the National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum, and by an Australian Government Research Training Programme (RTP) Scholarship for the first author Caroline Walters.
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThrough an in-depth exploration of mental health family carers' experiences during the COVID-19 pandemic in Australia, this co-produced study identified recommendations for advocacy, practice and policy implications to uphold family carer wellbeing. Government-enforced restrictions, changed service availability and difficulties accessing hospitals, led to additional anxiety, depression and elevated distress, especially for people experiencing mental health challenges before the pandemic. The National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum alongside two academic researchers aimed to discern the impact of care provision, levels of distress, unmet needs, challenges and benefits of providing support, across geographic locations and diverse communities.

methodsThis article reports on the survey component of a co-designed mixed-methods exploratory study of family carer experiences. A project steering group worked with two academic researchers, members of SWITCH Research Group, Monash University, to develop the 71-question online survey across 9-domains.

resultsFamily carers were relied upon to provide support and care when mental health services changed or closed. Carers support more than one person and typically people with daily and high-level needs. Caring levels increased from 26-h to an average of 40-h a week of support provision, with changed roles and increased complexity. Heightened demands became stress-inducing to the point of mental ill health and suicidality for some family carers.

conclusionGovernment policy and pandemic responses failed to address the financial, practical or emotional resources needed to fulfil the role of care provision and support to unwell and extremely distressed people with new or ongoing mental and psychological ill-health. PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION: From its inception, this project was co-produced and co-designed with mental health family carers and service users based on their expertise in understanding their experiences and ways to best explore these to the benefit and wellbeing of families in distress. The academic research partners both have active experience of supporting people with mental health challenges. Through each of the identified phases, lived experience expertise (family carers and service users) co-designed and co-facilitated the process. At times leading the process, such as in recruitment strategies, and at other times acting as guides. Guidance was provided by lived experience expertise in reflecting upon the literature review to understand what had been researched internationally and what would be important to understand in Australia. The academic partners advised on the possible processes for data collection, and the lived experience experts decided on the methodology based on that advice. Both the focus group and survey questions were developed and scrutinised from the perspective of the service users and carers in the project team. Difficult conversations were handled with respect, service users within the project team gently addressed areas of enquiry that may suggest stigma or feed into societal stereotypes of people with mental health challenges. Carers were able to consider the wording of questions to still be able to address areas of concern including domestic violence within the family unit and suicide. Dissemination strategies were planned together with the carer and service user representatives being co-presenters at conferences. The report for submission to the National Mental Health Commission (Australia) was written and reviewed with all partners. A committee of service users and carers, alongside the academic partners, planned the launch of the report in August 2023. The co-authorship of peer-reviewed articles has included family carers and service users from the National Mental Health Consumer and Carer Forum.

Indexed as

CaregiversCOVID-19AdultAustraliaFamilyFemaleHumansMaleMental HealthMental Health ServicesMiddle AgedPandemicsSARS-CoV-2Stress, PsychologicalSurveys and Questionnairescaregiversco‐designCOVID‐19familiesmental health

Identifiers

PMID39506501
PMCPMC11540934

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.