ArticleCurrent medicinal chemistry2026
An Innovative Telomere-associated Prognosis Model in AML: Predicting Immune Infiltration and Treatment Responsiveness.
Article in Current medicinal chemistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimsTo build an innovative telomere-associated scoring model to predict prognosis and treatment responsiveness in acute myeloid leukemia (AML).
backgroundAML is a highly heterogeneous malignant hematologic disorder with a poor prognosis. While telomere maintenance is frequently observed in tumors, investigations into telomere-related genes (TRGs) in AML remain limited.
objectivesThis study aimed to identify prognostic TRGs using the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression and multivariate Cox regression, evaluate their predictive value, explore the association between TRG scores and immune cell infiltration, and assess the sensitivity of high-scoring AML patients to chemotherapeutic agents.
methodsUnivariate Cox regression analysis was conducted on the TCGA cohort to identify prognostic TRGs and to develop the TRG scoring model using LASSO-Cox and multivariate Cox regression. Validation was performed on the GSE37642 cohort. Immune cell infiltration patterns were assessed through computational analysis, and the sensitivity to chemotherapeutic agents was evaluated.
resultsThirteen prognostic TRGs were identified, and a seven-TRG scoring model (including NOP10, OBFC1, PINX1, RPA2, SMG5, MAPKAPK5, and SMN1) was developed. Higher TRG scores were associated with a poorer prognosis, as confirmed in the GSE37642 cohort, and remained an independent prognostic factor even after adjusting for other clinical characteristics. The high-score group was characterized by elevated infiltration of B cells, T helper cells, natural killer cells, tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, regulatory T (Treg) cells, M2 macrophages, neutrophils, and monocytes, along with reduced infiltration of gamma delta T cells, CD4- T cells, and resting mast cells. Moreover, high infiltration of M2 macrophages and Tregs was associated with poor overall survival compared to low infiltration. Notably, high-risk AML patients were resistant to Erlotinib, Parthenolide, and Nutlin-3a, but sensitive to AC220, Midostaurin, and Tipifarnib. Additionally, using RT-qPCR, we observed significantly higher expression of two model genes, OBFC1 and SMN1, in AML tissues compared to control tissues.
conclusionThis innovative TRG scoring model demonstrates considerable predictive value for AML patient prognosis, offering valuable insights for optimizing treatment strategies and personalized medicine approaches. The identified TRGs and associated scoring models could aid in risk stratification and guide tailored therapeutic interventions in AML patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39506437What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.