ArticleScientific reports2024
Synchronization-based fusion of EEG and eye blink signals for enhanced decoding accuracy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The classification of walking and phases of gait using EEG: a scoping review.Journal of neuroengineering and rehabilitation · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Decoding locomotor tasks is crucial in cognitive neuroscience for understanding brain responses to physical tasks. Traditional methods like EEG offer brain activity insights but may require additional modalities for enhanced interpretative precision and depth. The integration of EEG with ocular metrics, particularly eye blinks, presents a promising avenue for understanding cognitive processes by combining neural and ocular behaviors. However, synchronizing EEG and eye blink activities poses a significant challenge due to their frequently inconsistent alignment. Our study with 35 participants performing various locomotor tasks such as standing, walking, and transversing obstacles introduced a novel methodology, pcEEG+, which fuses EEG principal components (pcEEG) with aligned eye blink data (syncBlink). The results demonstrated that pcEEG+ significantly improved decoding accuracy in locomotor tasks, reaching 78% in some conditions, and surpassed standalone pcEEG and syncBlink methods by 7.6% and 22.7%, respectively. The temporal generalization matrix confirmed the consistency of pcEEG+ across tasks and times. The results were replicated using two driving simulator datasets, thereby confirming the validity of our method. This study demonstrates the efficacy of the pcEEG+ method in decoding locomotor tasks, underscoring the importance of temporal synchronization for accuracy and offering a deeper insight into brain activity during complex movements.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.