ArticleScientific reports2024
Speech recognition using an english multimodal corpus with integrated image and depth information.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traditional English corpora mainly collect information from a single modality, but lack information from multimodal information, resulting in low quality of corpus information and certain problems with recognition accuracy. To solve the above problems, this paper proposes to introduce depth information into multimodal corpora, and studies the construction method of English multimodal corpora that integrates electronic images and depth information, as well as the speech recognition method of the corpus. The multimodal fusion strategy adopted integrates speech signals and image information, including key visual information such as the speaker's lip movements and facial expressions, and uses deep learning technology to mine acoustic and visual features. The acoustic model in the Kaldi toolkit is used for experimental research.Through experimental research, the following conclusions were drawn: Under 15-dimensional lip features, the accuracy of corpus A under monophone model was 2.4% higher than that of corpus B under monophone model when the SNR (signal-to-noise ratio) was 10dB, and the accuracy of corpus A under the triphone model at the signal-to-noise ratio of 10dB was 1.7% higher than that of corpus B under the triphone model at the signal-to-noise ratio of 10dB. Under the 32-dimensional lip features, the speech recognition effect of corpus A under the monophone model at the SNR of 10dB was 1.4% higher than that of corpus B under the monophone model at the SNR of 10dB, and the accuracy of corpus A under the triphone model at the SNR of 10dB was 2.6% higher than that of corpus B under the triphone model at the SNR of 10dB. The English multimodal corpus with image and depth information has a high accuracy, and the depth information helps to improve the accuracy of the corpus.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.