Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39506053›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Automated image acquisition and analysis of graphene and hexagonal boron nitride from pristine to highly defective and amorphous structures.

Diana Propst, Wael Joudi, Manuel Längle, Jacob Madsen, Clara Kofler, Barbara M Mayer, David Lamprecht, Clemens Mangler, Lado Filipovic, Toma Susi and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Diana PropstFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Wael JoudiFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Manuel LängleFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Jacob MadsenFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Clara KoflerFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Barbara M MayerFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
David LamprechtInstitute for Microelectronics, TU Wien, Gusshausstrasse 27-29/E360, 1040, Vienna, Austria.
Clemens ManglerFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria.
Lado FilipovicInstitute for Microelectronics, TU Wien, Gusshausstrasse 27-29/E360, 1040, Vienna, Austria.
Toma SusiFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria. toma.susi@univie.ac.at.
Jani KotakoskiFaculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, 1090, Vienna, Austria. jani.kotakoski@univie.ac.at.

Funding

Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) DOC142Austrian Science Fund (Fonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung) P35318EC | EU Framework Programme for Research and Innovation H2020 | H2020 Priority Excellent Science | H2020 European Research Council (H2020 Excellent Science - European Research Council) 756277-ATMEN
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Defect-engineered and even amorphous two-dimensional (2D) materials have recently gained interest due to properties that differ from their pristine counterparts. Since these properties are highly sensitive to the exact atomic structure, it is crucial to be able to characterize them at atomic resolution over large areas. This is only possible when the imaging process is automated to reduce the time spent on manual imaging, which at the same time reduces the observer bias in selecting the imaged areas. Since the necessary datasets include at least hundreds if not thousands of images, the analysis process similarly needs to be automated. Here, we introduce disorder into graphene and monolayer hexagonal boron nitride (hBN) using low-energy argon ion irradiation, and characterize the resulting disordered structures using automated scanning transmission electron microscopy annular dark field imaging combined with convolutional neural network-based analysis techniques. We show that disorder manifests in these materials in a markedly different way, where graphene accommodates vacancy-type defects by transforming hexagonal carbon rings into other polygonal shapes, whereas in hBN the disorder is observed simply as vacant lattice sites with very little rearrangement of the remaining atoms. Correspondingly, in the case of graphene, the highest introduced disorder leads to an amorphous membrane, whereas in hBN, the highly defective lattice contains a large number of vacancies and small pores with no indication of amorphisation. Overall, our study demonstrates that combining automated imaging and image analysis is a powerful way to characterize the structure of disordered and amorphous 2D materials, while also illustrating some of the remaining shortcomings with this methodology.

Identifiers

PMID39506053
PMCPMC11541565

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.