Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39506013›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Comprehensive walkability assessment of urban pedestrian environments using big data and deep learning techniques.

Xiaoran Huang, Li Zeng, Hanxiong Liang, Daoyong Li, Xin Yang, Bo Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Xiaoran HuangSchool of Architecture and Art, North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China. xiaoran.huang@ncut.edu.cn.
Li ZengSchool of Architecture and Art, North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China.
Hanxiong LiangSchool of Architecture and Art, North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China.
Daoyong LiSchool of Architecture and Art, North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China. lidaoyong@ncut.edu.cn.
Xin YangSchool of Architecture and Art, North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China.
Bo ZhangSchool of Architecture and Art, North China University of Technology, Beijing, 100144, China.

Funding

Beijing Municipal Commission of Education KM202210009008Beijing Municipal Office of Philosophy and Social Science Planning 23SRC024National Natural Science Foundation of China 52208039Yuxiu Innovation Project of NCUT 2024NCUTYXCX117
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Assessing street walkability is a critical agenda in urban planning and multidisciplinary research, as it facilitates public health, community cohesion, and urban sustainability. Existing evaluation systems primarily focus on objective measurements, often neglecting subjective assessments and the diverse walking needs influenced by different urban spatial elements. This study addresses these gaps by constructing a comprehensive evaluation framework that integrates both subjective and objective dimensions, combining three neighbourhood indicators: Macro-Scale Index, Micro-Scale Index, and Street Walking Preferences Index. A normalization weighting method synthesizes these indicators into a comprehensive index. We applied this framework to assess the street environment within Beijing's Fifth Ring Road. The empirical results demonstrate that: (1) The framework reliably reflects the distribution of walkability. (2) The three indicators show both similarities and differences, underscoring the need to consider the distinct roles of community and street-level elements and the interaction between subjective and objective dimensions. (3) In high-density cities with ring-road development patterns, the Macro-Scale Index closely aligns with the Comprehensive Index, demonstrating its accuracy in reflecting walkability. The proposed framework and findings offer new insights for street walkability research and theoretical support for developing more inclusive, sustainable and walkable cities.

Indexed as

Discrete choice modelStreet view imagerySubjective and objective evaluationWalkability assessment

Identifiers

PMID39506013
PMCPMC11541575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.