ArticleScientific reports2024
Performance of uncertainty-based active learning for efficient approximation of black-box functions in materials science.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- AI for Accelerated Materials Discovery: From Generative Design to Autonomous Realization.Chemical reviews · 2026Article
- Development of Machine-Learned Interatomic Potentials to Predict Structure, Transport, and Reactivity in Platinum-Based Fuel Cells.ACS omega · 2026Article
- Data-efficient learning for accurate identification of MAPK1 inhibitors using an active meta-deep learning framework.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Learning under constraints: a theoretical framework for comparing resource-constrained learning in biological and artificial systems.Frontiers in computational neuroscience · 2026Article
- A comprehensive benchmark of active learning strategies with AutoML for small-sample regression in materials science.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Obtaining a fine approximation of a black-box function is important for understanding and evaluating innovative materials. Active learning aims to improve the approximation of black-box functions with fewer training data. In this study, we investigate whether active learning based on uncertainty sampling enables the efficient approximation of black-box functions in regression tasks using various material databases. In cases where the inputs are provided uniformly and defined in a relatively low-dimensional space, the liquidus surfaces of the ternary systems are the focus. The results show that uncertainty-based active learning can produce a better black-box function with higher prediction accuracy than that by random sampling. Furthermore, in cases in which the inputs are distributed discretely and unbalanced in a high-dimensional feature space, datasets extracted from materials databases for inorganic materials, small molecules, and polymers are addressed, and uncertainty-based active learning is occasionally inefficient. Based on the dependency on the material descriptors, active learning tends to produce a better black-box functions than random sampling when the dimensions of the descriptor are small. The results indicate that active learning is occasionally inefficient in obtaining a better black-box function in materials science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.