ArticleScientific reports2024
Changes of upper-limb kinematics during practice of a redundant motor task in patients with Parkinson's disease.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The ability to learn novel motor skills is essential for patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) to regain activities of daily living. However, the underlying mechanisms of motor learning in PD remain unclear. To identify motor features that are distinctively manifested in PD during motor learning, we quantified a rich set of variables reflecting various aspects of the learning process in a virtual throwing task. While the performance outcome improved similarly over 3 days of practice for both PD patients and age-matched controls, further analysis revealed distinct learning processes between the two groups. PD patients initially performed with a slow release velocity and gradually increased it as practice progressed, whereas the control group began with an unnecessarily rapid release velocity, which they later stabilized at a lower value. Performance characteristics related to the timing of ball release and the inter-release interval did not show significant group differences, although they were modulated across practice in both groups. After one week, both groups retained the performance outcomes and underlying kinematics developed over practice. This study underscores the importance of analyzing the multi-faceted learning process to characterize motor skill learning in PD. The findings may provide insights into PD pathophysiology and inform rehabilitation strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.