Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39505940›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Deep learning hybrid model ECG classification using AlexNet and parallel dual branch fusion network model.

Manjur Kolhar, Ahmed M Al Rajeh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Manjur KolharDepartment of Health Management and Information Technology, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 36362, Saudi Arabia. mkolhar@kfu.edu.sa.
Ahmed M Al RajehDepartment of Respiratory Care, College of Applied Medical Sciences, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, 36362, Saudi Arabia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cardiovascular diseases are a cause of death making it crucial to accurately diagnose them. Electrocardiography plays a role in detecting heart issues such as heart attacks, bundle branch blocks and irregular heart rhythms. Manual analysis of ECGs is prone to mistakes and time consuming, underscoring the importance of automated methods. This study uses AI models like AlexNet and a dual branch model for categorizing ECG signals from the PTB Diagnostic ECG Database. AlexNet achieved a validation accuracy of 98.64% and a test set accuracy of 99% while the dual branch fusion network model achieved a test set accuracy of 99%. Data preprocessing involved standardizing, balancing and reshaping ECG signals. These models exhibited precision, sensitivity and specificity. In comparison to state of the arts' models such as Hybrid AlexNet SVM and DCNN LSTM our proposed models displayed performance. The high accuracy rates of 99% underscore their potential for ECG classification. These results validate the advantages of incorporating learning models into setups for automated ECG analysis providing adaptable solutions for various healthcare settings including rural areas.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectrocardiographyAlgorithmsHumansNeural Networks, ComputerSignal Processing, Computer-Assisted

Identifiers

PMID39505940
PMCPMC11542006

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.