Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39505779›Full record

ReviewWiener klinische Wochenschrift2025

Amyloid-beta antibody treatment in Alzheimer's disease : An update on recent data and outlook on implementation in clinical routine.

Elisabeth Stögmann, Reinhold Schmidt

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Wiener klinische Wochenschrift, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Elisabeth StögmannDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Vienna, Waehringer Gürtel 18-20, 1090, Vienna, Austria. elisabeth.stoegmann@meduniwien.ac.at.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4688-8482
Reinhold SchmidtDepartment of Neurology, Medical University of Graz, Auenbruggerplatz 22, 8036, Graz, Austria.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Amyloid-beta (Aβ) antibody treatment has emerged as a promising approach for the treatment of Alzheimer's disease (AD), targeting the accumulation of Aβ plaques, which are a hallmark of the disease. This review provides an update on recent clinical trial data, highlighting the efficacy and safety of various antibodies targeting Aβ. Recent trials have demonstrated that certain Aβ antibodies can reduce amyloid plaques and slow cognitive decline in patients with early AD. Key findings from trials of drugs are discussed, including their mechanisms of action, dosing regimens, and observed side effects. The potential for Aβ antibody therapy to be integrated into routine clinical practice is also explored. While Aβ antibody therapy represents a significant advancement in AD treatment, ongoing research is needed to optimize their use and understand their long-term impact. This review underscores the importance of personalized medicine in AD and the need for continued innovation in therapeutic strategies.

Indexed as

Alzheimer DiseaseAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedEvidence-Based MedicineHumansPlaque, AmyloidTreatment OutcomeAmyloid beta-PeptidesAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAlzheimerDementiaMonoclonal antibodyNew therapeutic strategyUse recommendation

Identifiers

PMID39505779
PMCPMC11926045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.