Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39505775›Full record

ReviewUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2024

[Small renal mass: which criteria are decisive for a tumor board?]

Désirée Louise Dräger, Cesar Rojas Cruz, Jascha Held, Ferry Niepel, Annette Zimpfer, Oliver W Hakenberg

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Désirée Louise DrägerKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland. desiree.draeger@med.uni-rostock.de.
Cesar Rojas CruzKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.
Jascha HeldKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.
Ferry NiepelKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.
Annette ZimpferInstitut für Pathologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Rostock, Deutschland.
Oliver W HakenbergKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Rostock, Schillingallee 35, 18057, Rostock, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Small renal masses (SRM) are a heterogeneous group of tumors with varying metastatic potential. The increasing use and improvement in the quality of abdominal imaging have led to an increasingly earlier diagnosis of incidental SRM, which are asymptomatic and confined to the organ. Despite these advances in imaging and the growing use of renal tumor biopsies, preoperative diagnosis of malignancy remains difficult. The treatment of SRM has shifted away from radical nephrectomy and now primarily includes organ-sparing surgery or active surveillance. The optimal strategy for treating SRM is continuously evolving as studies from prospective data registries can identify factors that influence both short- and long-term patient outcomes. Recent research on biomarkers, imaging techniques, and machine learning offer promising approaches to a deeper understanding of tumor biology and treatment options for this patient population.

Indexed as

Kidney NeoplasmsNephrectomyHumansOrgan Sparing TreatmentsTumor BurdenWatchful WaitingActive surveillanceBiopsyNeoplasm metastasisRenal systemTumor biomarkers

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.