Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39505770›Full record

ArticleTAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik2024

Fine mapping of QGPC.caas-7AL for grain protein content in bread wheat.

Dehui Zhao, Jianqi Zeng, Hui Jin, Dan Liu, Li Yang, Xianchun Xia, Yubing Tian, Yan Zhang, Shuanghe Cao, Wei Zhu and 4 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Fine mapping of QPm.caas-4BL.2 for adult-plant resistance to powdery mildew in wheat.TAG. Theoretical and applied genetics. Theoretische und angewandte Genetik · 2026
    Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Dehui ZhaoCollege of Agriculture, The Analysis and Testing Center of College of Agriculture, Henan University of Science and Technology, 263 Kaiyuan Avenue, Luoyang, 471000, Henan Province, China.
Jianqi ZengInstitute of Crop Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Hui JinSino-Russia Agricultural Scientific and Technological Cooperation Center, Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, 368 Xuefu Street, Harbin, 150086, Heilongjiang Province, China.
Dan LiuInstitute of Crop Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Li YangLuoyang Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, 1 Nongke Street, Luoyang, 471022, Henan Province, China.
Xianchun XiaInstitute of Crop Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yubing TianInstitute of Crop Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Yan ZhangInstitute of Crop Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Shuanghe CaoInstitute of Crop Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Wei ZhuThe Suihuang Laboratory, Shangqiu Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Shangqiu, 476000, Henan Province, China.
Chunping WangCollege of Agriculture, The Analysis and Testing Center of College of Agriculture, Henan University of Science and Technology, 263 Kaiyuan Avenue, Luoyang, 471000, Henan Province, China.
Zhonghu HeInstitute of Crop Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China.
Jindong LiuInstitute of Crop Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China. liujindong@caas.cn.
Yong ZhangInstitute of Crop Sciences, State Key Laboratory of Crop Gene Resources and Breeding, National Wheat Improvement Centre, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences (CAAS), 12 Zhongguancun South Street, Beijing, 100081, China. zhangyong05@caas.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3669-3908

Funding

the CAAS Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program CAAS-ZDRW202002the Core Research Budget of the Non-profit Governmental Research Institutions S2022ZD04the Doctoral Research Launch Fund of Henan University of Science and Technology 13480100the Luoyang Core Technology Research Public Welfare Program 2302034Athe Natural Science Foundation of China 32272182the Natural Science Foundation of China 32401917
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

key messageA major stable QTL, QGPC.caas-7AL, for grain protein content of wheat, was narrowed down to a 1.82-Mb inter on chromosome 7AL, and four candidate genes were predicated. Wheat grain protein content (GPC) is important for end-use quality. Identification of genetic loci for GPC is helpful to create new varieties with good processing quality and nutrients. Zhongmai 578 (ZM578) and Jimai 22 (JM22) are two elite wheat varieties with different contents of GPC. In the present study, 262 recombinant inbred lines (RILs) derived from a cross between ZM578 and JM22 were used to map the GPC with high-density wheat Illumina iSelect 50 K single-nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array. Seven quantitative trait loci (QTLs) were identified for GPC on chromosomes 3AS, 3AL, 3BS, 4AL, 5BS, 5DL and 7AL by inclusive composite interval mapping, designated as QGPC.caas-3AS, QGPC.caas-3AL, QGPC.caas-3BS, QGPC.caas-4AL, QGPC.caas-5BS, QGPC.caas-5DL and QGPC.caas-7AL, respectively. Among these, alleles for increasing GPC at QGPC.caas-3AS, QGPC.caas-3BS, QGPC.caas-4AL and QGPC.caas-7AL loci were contributed by ZM578, whereas those at the other three loci were from JM22. The stable QTL QGPC.caas-7AL was fine mapped to a 1.82-Mb physical interval using secondary populations from six heterozygous recombinant plants obtained by selfing a residual RIL. Four genes were predicted as candidates of QGPC.caas-7AL based on sequence polymorphism and expression patterns. The near-isogenic lines (NILs) with the favorable allele at the QGPC.caas-7AL locus increased Farinograph stability time, Extensograph extension area, extensibility and maximum resistance by 19.6%, 6.3%, 6.0% and 20.3%, respectively. Kompetitive allele-specific PCR (KASP) marker for QGPC.caas-7AL was developed and validated in a diverse panel of 166 Chinese wheat cultivars. These results provide further insight into the genetic basis of GPC, and the fine-mapped QGPC.caas-7AL will be an attractive target for map-based cloning and marker-assisted selection in wheat breeding programs.

Indexed as

Chromosome MappingGrain ProteinsPhenotypePolymorphism, Single NucleotideQuantitative Trait LociTriticumBreadChromosomes, PlantEdible GrainGenes, PlantGenetic LinkageGrain Proteins

Identifiers

PMID39505770

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.