Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39505514›Full record

ArticleInvestigative and clinical urology2024

Application of deep learning for semantic segmentation in robotic prostatectomy: Comparison of convolutional neural networks and visual transformers.

Sahyun Pak, Sung Gon Park, Jeonghyun Park, Hong Rock Choi, Jun Ho Lee, Wonchul Lee, Sung Tae Cho, Young Goo Lee, Hanjong Ahn

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Investigative and clinical urology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Artificial intelligence in urology training Enhancing annotation, feedback, and evaluation in robotic, laparoscopic, and endoscopic surgery.Canadian Urological Association journal = Journal de l'Association des urologues du Canada · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Sahyun PakDepartment of Urology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. qkrtkgus0@naver.com.ORCID 0000-0001-7015-4943
Sung Gon ParkDepartment of Urology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7677-2854
Jeonghyun ParkSTARLABS Corp., Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0009-0005-0207-3427
Hong Rock ChoiSTARLABS Corp., Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0009-0006-2132-5340
Jun Ho LeeSTARLABS Corp., Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0009-0009-6330-0653
Wonchul LeeDepartment of Urology, Dongtan Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Hwaseong, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-7585-7485
Sung Tae ChoDepartment of Urology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-4691-6159
Young Goo LeeDepartment of Urology, Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-0339-7763
Hanjong AhnDepartment of Urology, Asan Medical Center, University of Ulsan College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.ORCID 0000-0001-7608-5352

Funding

Hallym HURF-2023-24Korean Society for Urological Ultrasonography KSUU 2023-01MSS S3288928
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSemantic segmentation is a fundamental part of the surgical application of deep learning. Traditionally, segmentation in vision tasks has been performed using convolutional neural networks (CNNs), but the transformer architecture has recently been introduced and widely investigated. We aimed to investigate the performance of deep learning models in segmentation in robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) and identify which of the architectures is superior for segmentation in robotic surgery. MATERIALS AND

methodsIntraoperative images during RARP were obtained. The dataset was randomly split into training and validation data. Segmentation of the surgical instruments, bladder, prostate, vas and seminal vesicle was performed using three CNN models (DeepLabv3, MANet, and U-Net++) and three transformers (SegFormer, BEiT, and DPT), and their performances were analyzed.

resultsThe overall segmentation performance during RARP varied across different model architectures. For the CNN models, DeepLabV3 achieved a mean Dice score of 0.938, MANet scored 0.944, and U-Net++ reached 0.930. For the transformer architectures, SegFormer attained a mean Dice score of 0.919, BEiT scored 0.916, and DPT achieved 0.940. The performance of CNN models was superior to that of transformer models in segmenting the prostate, vas, and seminal vesicle.

conclusionsDeep learning models provided accurate segmentation of the surgical instruments and anatomical structures observed during RARP. Both CNN and transformer models showed reliable predictions in the segmentation task; however, CNN models may be more suitable than transformer models for organ segmentation and may be more applicable in unusual cases. Further research with large datasets is needed.

Indexed as

Deep LearningNeural Networks, ComputerProstatectomyRobotic Surgical ProceduresHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsSemanticsArtificial intelligenceComputer vision systemsDeep learningProstatectomy

Identifiers

PMID39505514
PMCPMC11543645

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.