Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39505362›Full record

ArticleThe clinical teacher2025

Social media quality in undergraduate medical education: A reconceptualisation and taxonomy.

Jonathan Guckian, Sarah Edwards, Eliot L Rees, Bryan Burford

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The clinical teacher, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jonathan GuckianAdvanced Medical Education Fellow and Dermatology Registrar, Leeds Institute for Medical Education, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8162-1583
Sarah EdwardsEmergency Department, Queen's Medical Centre, University of Nottingham NHS Trust, NG7 2UH, Nottingham, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8966-5065
Eliot L ReesLecturer in Medical Education, School of Medicine, Keele University, Keele, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6458-5808
Bryan BurfordSenior Lecturer in Medical Education, Newcastle University School of Medical Education, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4687-7556

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial Media (SoMe) as a learning tool, though ubiquitous in society and popular within medical education, is often criticised as superficial. Its limitless output has been blamed for encouraging shorter attention spans and shirking in-depth reflection. The evidence base is itself superficial and lacking rigour or meaning. We aimed to consider a theoretical basis for how 'quality' learning may happen on such platforms. Our findings then informed the construction of a taxonomy for SoMe learning.

methodsWe conducted a qualitative interview study of United Kingdom (UK) medical students using a theory-informed inductive study design. The research question was: 'How do medical students conceptualise quality of learning on social media?'. We purposively sampled participants from responses to a short survey collecting demographic and SoMe usage data. Interview data were analysed using framework analysis and informed by Blooms taxonomy, connectivism and communities of practice (CoP) theories.

resultsWe received survey responses from 118 medical students across 25 UK medical schools. From these, 13 participants were recruited to individual semi-structured interviews. We constructed three themes through framework analysis of interview data: cognitive hacking, professional identity reflection and safety, control and capital. DISCUSSION: Quality SoMe learning may be conceptualised as a socially connected process, built upon constantly evolving networks but inexorably influenced by fluctuating hierarchy within learner-centric CoP. Educators and institutions may support high-quality learning for students through engagement which promotes community development, and safe, listening environments which foster professional identity formation.

Indexed as

Education, Medical, UndergraduateSocial MediaStudents, MedicalFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicLearningMaleQualitative ResearchUnited Kingdom

Identifiers

PMID39505362
PMCPMC11663730

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.