ArticleNan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University2024
[A lung sound classification model with a spatial and channel reconstruction convolutional module].
Article in Nan fang yi ke da xue xue bao = Journal of Southern Medical University, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveTo construct a model with a spatial and channel reconstruction convolutional module for accurate identification and classification of lung sound data.
methodsWe propose a convolutional network architecture combining the spatial-channel reconstruction convolution (SCConv) module. A lung sound feature extraction method combining the dual tunable Q-factor wavelet transform (DTQWT) with the triple Wigner-Ville transform (WVT) was used to improve the model's ability to capture the key features of the lung sounds by adaptively focusing on the important channel and spatial features. The performance of the model for classification of normal, crackles, wheezes, and crackles with wheezes was tested using the ICBHI2017 dataset. RESULTS AND
conclusionThe accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and F1 score of the proposed method reached 85.68%, 93.55%, 86.79% and 90.51%, respectively, demonstrating its good performance in classification tasks in the ICBHI2017 lung sound database, especially for distinguishing normal from abnormal lung sounds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.