Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39505119›Full record

ArticleThe journal of pain2025

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) use for self-management of pain: Insights from cross-sectional and ecological momentary assessment data.

Chung Jung Mun, Leigh V Panlilio, Kelly E Dunn, Johannes Thrul, Christopher R McCurdy, David H Epstein, Kirsten E Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The journal of pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chung Jung MunEdson College of Nursing and Health Innovation, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA; Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Leigh V PanlilioReal-World Assessment, Prediction, and Treatment Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kelly E DunnDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Johannes ThrulDepartment of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center at Johns Hopkins, Baltimore, MD, USA; Centre for Alcohol Policy Research, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Australia.
Christopher R McCurdyDepartment of Medicinal Chemistry, College of Pharmacy, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
David H EpsteinReal-World Assessment, Prediction, and Treatment Unit, National Institute on Drug Abuse Intramural Research Program, Baltimore, MD, USA.
Kirsten E SmithDepartment of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: ksmit398@jh.edu.

Funding

Sleep and circadian rhythm disturbances as risk and progression factors for multiple chronic pain conditionsR01NS129887 · NINDS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI Chung Jung Mun · 2023 to 2026
$2.5M
Real-world momentary assessment of kratom use and laboratory-based observed cessation accompanied by product assays: Toward an interdisciplinary characterization of kratom use and pharmacologyR00DA055571 · NIDA · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SMITH, KIRSTEN · 2024 to 2025
$498k
NIDA NIH HHS K99 DA055571NIDA NIH HHS R00 DA055571NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS129887
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Kratom (Mitragyna speciosa) is increasingly used in the US for self-management of pain, despite limited research on its efficacy and safety. To better understand how and why people use kratom for pain self-management, we analyzed baseline survey data (N = 395) and 15-day ecological momentary assessment (EMA) data (N = 357) from kratom consumers across the US. Although we recruited participants based on their kratom use, not on whether they used it for pain management, nearly half (49.1 %) met criteria for chronic pain, with many reporting substantial pain relief and high effectiveness of kratom in managing pain. A majority (69.2 %) reported difficulties in obtaining adequate pain treatment, and most indicated that these challenges impacted their decision to try kratom. Most participants did not report concerns about overuse or significant side effects. EMA data showed that, regardless of chronic-pain status, pain relief was the most frequently endorsed primary motivation for daily kratom use. There were no significant association between daily pain levels and kratom use frequency, and no difference in the daily kratom use between those with vs. without chronic pain. Recent kratom use was associated with lower current pain levels. Stronger subjective effects of kratom were associated with lower pain levels. This effect was significantly moderated by chronic-pain status: those with chronic pain showed a stronger link between subjective kratom effects and pain reduction. These findings underscore the urgent need for systematic, rigorous research on long-term implications, efficacy, and safety of kratom in pain management to guide informed clinical practices and regulatory policies. PERSPECTIVE: This study reveals that chronic pain is common among kratom consumers, who frequently use it for pain self-management and report significant relief, as shown by ecological momentary assessment. There is an urgent need for research into kratom's safety, efficacy, and mechanisms to guide clinical practice and inform policies.

Indexed as

Chronic PainEcological Momentary AssessmentMitragynaPain ManagementPhytotherapySelf-ManagementAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAnalgesiaEcological momentary assessmentKratomMitragyna speciosaPain

Identifiers

PMID39505119
PMCPMC11781972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.