ArticlePhysiology & behavior2025
Walking economy and exercise efficiency in successful weight loss maintainers.
Article in Physiology & behavior, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeFollowing short-term weight loss, the energetic cost of transport decreases and exercise efficiency increases. Whether changes persist during long-term weight maintenance is unknown.
methodsWe compared walking economy and exercise efficiency in weight loss maintainers (WLM, maintaining ≥13.6 kg weight loss for ≥1 year), controls without obesity (NC, BMI similar to current BMI of WLM), and controls with overweight/obesity (OC, BMI similar to pre-weight loss BMI of WLM). Energy expenditure (EE) and respiratory quotient were measured using indirect calorimetry at rest, while standing, and during treadmill walking. Gross and net energetic cost of transport (J/kg/m) was measured during level treadmill walking at 0.75, 1.12, and 1.52 m/s. Gross, net, and delta efficiency (%) were measured during inclined treadmill walking (2 %, 4 %, and 6 % grade) and a constant speed (1.12 m/s).
resultsWLM (n = 32, BMI: 23.8 ± 2.3 kg/m
conclusionWLM had lower walking economy and greater walking efficiency compared to OC, but there were no differences between WLM and NC. Thus, individuals maintaining significant weight loss may be successful with long-term weight loss, in part, due to resistance against adaptive reductions in walking energetics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.