ArticleCardiology2025
Signal-Guided Multitask Learning for Myocardial Infarction Classification Using Images of Electrocardiogram.
Article in Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial intelligence-enhanced electrocardiography for acute myocardial infarction detection: a systematic review.Cardiovascular diagnosis and therapy · 2026Review
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionThe diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) needs to be swift and accurate, but definitively diagnosing it based on the first test encountered in clinical practice, the electrocardiogram (ECG), is not an easy task. The purpose of the study was to develop a deep learning (DL) algorithm using multitask learning method to differentiate patients experiencing MI from those without coronary artery disease using image-based ECG data.
methodsA DL model was developed based on 11,227 ECG images. We developed a new ECG interpretation algorithm through signal-guided multitask learning, building on a previously published single-task algorithm. The utility of this model was evaluated by testing 51 physicians in interpreting ECGs with and without the assistance of the DL model.
resultsThe proposed model demonstrated superior performance, achieving 90.56% accuracy, 83.82% sensitivity, 93.02% specificity, 81.44% precision, and an F1 score of 82.61% in discriminating MI ECG. Overall, the median accuracy of ECG interpretation improved from 62% to 68% with the DL algorithm. Trainees and specialists in internal medicine experienced significant accuracy increases (60-66% for trainees, 72-80% for specialists). In the MI group, NSTEMI accuracy was notably lower than STEMI (33% vs. 80%, p < 0.001), but the DL algorithm improved interpretative capabilities in both NSTEMI and STEMI.
conclusionsSignal-guided multitask DL algorithm demonstrated superior performance compared with previous single-task algorithm. The DL algorithm supports the physicians' decision discriminating MI ECGs from non-MI ECGs. The improvement was consistent in subgroups of STEMI and NSTEMI.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.