Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504941›Full record

ArticleCardiology2025

Signal-Guided Multitask Learning for Myocardial Infarction Classification Using Images of Electrocardiogram.

Bo Eun Park, Byungeun Shon, Jungrae Cho, Min-Su Jung, Jong Sung Park, Myeong Seop Kim, Eunkyu Lee, Hyohun Choi, Hyuk Kyoon Park, Yoon Jung Park and 9 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cardiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

19 authors.

Bo Eun ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Byungeun ShonDepartment of Medical Informatics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jungrae ChoResearch Center for Artificial Intelligence in Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Deagu, Republic of Korea.
Min-Su JungDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jong Sung ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Myeong Seop KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Eunkyu LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hyohun ChoiDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hyuk Kyoon ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Yoon Jung ParkSchool of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hong Nyun KimSchool of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Namkyun KimDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Myung Hwan BaeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Jang Hoon LeeDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Dong Heon YangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Hun Sik ParkDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Yongkeun ChoDepartment of Internal Medicine, Kyungpook National University Hospital, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Sungmoon JeongDepartment of Medical Informatics, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.
Se Yong JangSchool of Medicine, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Republic of Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionThe diagnosis of myocardial infarction (MI) needs to be swift and accurate, but definitively diagnosing it based on the first test encountered in clinical practice, the electrocardiogram (ECG), is not an easy task. The purpose of the study was to develop a deep learning (DL) algorithm using multitask learning method to differentiate patients experiencing MI from those without coronary artery disease using image-based ECG data.

methodsA DL model was developed based on 11,227 ECG images. We developed a new ECG interpretation algorithm through signal-guided multitask learning, building on a previously published single-task algorithm. The utility of this model was evaluated by testing 51 physicians in interpreting ECGs with and without the assistance of the DL model.

resultsThe proposed model demonstrated superior performance, achieving 90.56% accuracy, 83.82% sensitivity, 93.02% specificity, 81.44% precision, and an F1 score of 82.61% in discriminating MI ECG. Overall, the median accuracy of ECG interpretation improved from 62% to 68% with the DL algorithm. Trainees and specialists in internal medicine experienced significant accuracy increases (60-66% for trainees, 72-80% for specialists). In the MI group, NSTEMI accuracy was notably lower than STEMI (33% vs. 80%, p < 0.001), but the DL algorithm improved interpretative capabilities in both NSTEMI and STEMI.

conclusionsSignal-guided multitask DL algorithm demonstrated superior performance compared with previous single-task algorithm. The DL algorithm supports the physicians' decision discriminating MI ECGs from non-MI ECGs. The improvement was consistent in subgroups of STEMI and NSTEMI.

Indexed as

Deep LearningElectrocardiographyMyocardial InfarctionAlgorithmsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSensitivity and SpecificityArtificial intelligenceDeep learningElectrocardiogramMyocardial infarction

Identifiers

PMID39504941
PMCPMC12324791

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.