Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504560›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical informatics2024

Clinical Decision Support to Increase Emergency Department Naloxone Coprescribing: Implementation Report.

Stuart W Sommers, Heather J Tolle, Katy E Trinkley, Christine G Johnston, Caitlin L Dietsche, Stephanie V Eldred, Abraham T Wick, Jason A Hoppe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Stuart W SommersDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17th Avenue, 7th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, United States, 1 2039821107.ORCID 0009-0001-6526-0765
Heather J TolleDepartment of Emergency Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, 12401 East 17th Avenue, 7th Floor, Aurora, CO, 80045, United States, 1 2039821107.ORCID 0000-0001-5555-5714
Katy E TrinkleyAdult and Child Center for Outcomes Research and Delivery Science Center, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0003-2041-7404
Christine G JohnstonDepartment of Medicine-Internal Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-6408-0458
Caitlin L DietscheDepartment of Medicine-Hospital Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3057-0878
Stephanie V EldredDepartment of Medicine-Hospital Medicine, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-0872-4658
Abraham T WickInformation Technology Epic Application Systems, UCHealth Metro Denver, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-4113-1985
Jason A HoppeDepartment of Emergency Medicine-Medical Toxicology and Pharmacology, School of Medicine, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-3396-6907

Funding

Mentored Education for Dissemination and Implementation Science (MEDIS) ProgramR25DK123008 · NIDDK · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI BROWNSON, ROSS C, HAIRE-JOSHU, DEBRA · 2020 to 2024
$1.1M
Personalizing Clinical Decision Support for Heart Failure Treatment to Clinicians' NeedsK23HL161352 · NHLBI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI Katy E Trinkley · 2022 to 2026
$869k
NHLBI NIH HHS K23 HL161352NIDDK NIH HHS R25 DK123008
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Coprescribing naloxone with opioid analgesics is a Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) best practice to mitigate the risk of fatal opioid overdose, yet coprescription by emergency medicine clinicians is rare, occurring less than 5% of the time it is indicated. Clinical decision support (CDS) has been associated with increased naloxone prescribing; however, key CDS design characteristics and pragmatic outcome measures necessary to understand replicability and effectiveness have not been reported. Objective: This study aimed to rigorously evaluate and quantify the impact of CDS designed to improve emergency department (ED) naloxone coprescribing. We hypothesized CDS would increase naloxone coprescribing and the number of naloxone prescriptions filled by patients discharged from EDs in a large health care system. Methods: Following user-centered design principles, we designed and implemented a fully automated, interruptive, electronic health record-based CDS to nudge clinicians to coprescribe naloxone with high-risk opioid prescriptions. "High-risk" opioid prescriptions were defined as any opioid analgesic prescription ≥90 total morphine milligram equivalents per day or for patients with a prior diagnosis of opioid use disorder or opioid overdose. The Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, and Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework was used to evaluate pragmatic CDS outcomes of reach, effectiveness, adoption, implementation, and maintenance. Effectiveness was the primary outcome of interest and was assessed by (1) constructing a Bayesian structural time-series model of the number of ED visits with naloxone coprescriptions before and after CDS implementation and (2) calculating the percentage of naloxone prescriptions associated with CDS that were filled at an outpatient pharmacy. Mann-Kendall tests were used to evaluate longitudinal trends in CDS adoption. All outcomes were analyzed in R (version 4.2.2; R Core Team). Unlabelled: Between November 2019 and July 2023, there were 1,994,994 ED visits. CDS reached clinicians in 0.83% (16,566/1,994,994) of all visits and 15.99% (16,566/103,606) of ED visits where an opioid was prescribed at discharge. Clinicians adopted CDS, coprescribing naloxone in 34.36% (6613/19,246) of alerts. CDS was effective, increasing naloxone coprescribing from baseline by 18.1 (95% CI 17.9-18.3) coprescriptions per week or 2,327% (95% CI 3390-3490). Patients filled 43.80% (1989/4541) of naloxone coprescriptions. The CDS was implemented simultaneously at every ED and no adaptations were made to CDS postimplementation. CDS was maintained beyond the study period and maintained its effect, with adoption increasing over time (τ=0.454; P<.001). Conclusions: Our findings advance the evidence that electronic health record-based CDS increases the number of naloxone coprescriptions and improves the distribution of naloxone. Our time series analysis controls for secular trends and strongly suggests that minimally interruptive CDS significantly improves process outcomes.

Indexed as

Decision Support Systems, ClinicalEmergency Service, HospitalNaloxoneNarcotic AntagonistsAdultAnalgesics, OpioidElectronic Health RecordsFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedAnalgesics, OpioidNaloxoneNarcotic Antagonistsclinical decision support systemsdrug monitoringdrug overdoseharm minimizationharm reductionnaloxonenaloxone coprescribingopioid analgesicopioid overdoseopioid prescribingopioid useorder sets

Identifiers

PMID39504560
PMCPMC11560079

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.