Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504507›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology2025

Pooled Long-Term Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab or Nivolumab Alone in Patients With Advanced Melanoma.

Georgina V Long, James Larkin, Dirk Schadendorf, Jean-Jacques Grob, Christopher D Lao, Iván Márquez-Rodas, John Wagstaff, Céleste Lebbé, Jacopo Pigozzo, Caroline Robert and 15 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. CST7Translational cancer research · 2025
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors.

Georgina V LongMelanoma Institute Australia and Royal North Shore and Mater Hospitals, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-3545
James LarkinThe Royal Marsden Hospital NHS Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0001-5569-9523
Dirk SchadendorfUniversity Hospital, German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT)-West, Campus Essen, & Research Alliance Ruhr, Research Center One Health, University Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-7858
Jean-Jacques GrobAix-Marseille University, AP-HM, Timone, Marseille, France.ORCID 0000-0002-0667-153X
Christopher D LaoUniversity of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
Iván Márquez-RodasHospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-2476-668X
John WagstaffSwansea University Medical School, Swansea, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-1140-5981
Céleste LebbéUniversité Paris Cité, AP-HP Dermato-oncology, Cancer Institute AP-HP, Nord Paris Cité, INSERM U976, Saint Louis Hospital, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-5854-7290
Jacopo PigozzoVeneto Institute of Oncology IOV-IRCCS, Padua, Italy.ORCID 0000-0003-2427-8915
Caroline RobertGustave Roussy, Institut National de la Santé et de la Recherche Médicale U981, Paris, France.ORCID 0000-0002-9493-0238
Paolo A AsciertoIstituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione G. Pascale, Naples, Italy.ORCID 0000-0002-8322-475X
Victoria AtkinsonPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, and Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Greenslopes, QLD, Australia.
Michael A PostowMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, NY.ORCID 0000-0002-3367-7961
Michael B AtkinsGeorgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Washington, DC.ORCID 0000-0003-3901-9924
Mario SznolYale University School of Medicine and Yale Cancer Center, New Haven, CT.ORCID 0000-0003-4137-9662
Margaret K CallahanPrincess Alexandra Hospital, Woolloongabba, and Gallipoli Medical Research Foundation, Greenslopes Private Hospital, Greenslopes, QLD, Australia.
Suzanne L TopalianJohns Hopkins Bloomberg-Kimmel Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy and Sidney Kimmel Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, MD.ORCID 0000-0002-0821-8587
Jeffrey A SosmanNorthwestern University, Chicago, IL.
Srividya KotapatiBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.ORCID 0009-0008-7352-2885
Pratik K ThakkarBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-0413-8408
Corey RitchingsBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.ORCID 0000-0002-9240-9211
Melanie Pe BenitoBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Sandra ReBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
Samira SoleymaniBristol Myers Squibb, Princeton, NJ.
F Stephen HodiDana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, MA.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeNivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) combination and NIVO monotherapy have demonstrated durable clinical benefit in patients with unresectable/metastatic melanoma. This analysis describes long-term overall survival (OS) with the combination or monotherapy pooled across all major company-sponsored trials, as well as clinical factors associated with survival, in patients with immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment-naïve unresectable/metastatic melanoma.

methodsData were pooled from six CheckMate studies in ICI treatment-naïve patients receiving NIVO + IPI (NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg or NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg) or NIVO monotherapy (3 mg/kg). OS was assessed for each treatment, as well as in select subgroups. Cox proportional multivariate analysis (MVA) and classification and regression tree (CART) analyses were performed within treatment arms.

resultsMedian follow-up for OS was 45.0 months for patients treated with NIVO + IPI (n = 839) and 35.8 months for patients treated with NIVO (n = 536). OS was longer with NIVO + IPI versus NIVO monotherapy (hazard ratio, 0.78 [95% CI, 0.67 to 0.91]), with 6-year OS rates of 52% versus 41%, respectively. Consistent benefit was observed in

conclusionIn this large, pooled nonrandomized retrospective analysis, we observed that NIVO + IPI provides longer OS than NIVO in patients with ICI treatment-naïve advanced melanoma and identifies clinical factors that appear to be associated with survival for each treatment, which may assist with treatment decision making.

Indexed as

Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy ProtocolsIpilimumabMelanomaNivolumabSkin NeoplasmsAdultAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsMaleMiddle AgedImmune Checkpoint InhibitorsIpilimumabNivolumab

Identifiers

PMID39504507
PMCPMC11895829

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.