Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504446›Full record

ReviewRheumatology (Oxford, England)2025

Inclusion body myositis and immunosenescence: current evidence and future perspectives.

Nur Azizah Allameen, Sharfaraz Salam, Venkat Reddy, Pedro M Machado

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Rheumatology (Oxford, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Nur Azizah AllameenDivision of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Woodlands Health, Woodlands, Singapore.
Sharfaraz SalamDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.
Venkat ReddyDepartment of Rheumatology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-3757-4425
Pedro M MachadoDepartment of Neuromuscular Diseases, UCL Queen Square Institute of Neurology, University College London, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8411-7972

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care ResearchQueen Square Institute of Neurology & Cleveland Clinic LondonUCLUK Chief Investigator for the Abcuro study NCT05721573University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

IBM remains an enigmatic and complex muscle disorder where a deeper understanding of disease pathomechanisms and the identification of potential genetic contributors represent an unmet need. The absence of effective treatments has spurred endeavours to reassess the interplay between degeneration, including autophagy, mitochondrial dysfunction and proteasomal dysregulation, and autoimmunity. IBM is unique among the other idiopathic inflammatory myopathies owing to its molecular signature involving highly differentiated cytotoxic T cells that evade immune regulation. This has led to a resurgence of interest in the development of immunomodulatory therapy. This review discusses the potential role of cellular immunosenescence in sustaining inflammation and/or fibrotic remodelling observed in IBM and appraises the rationale for some potential therapeutic approaches to mitigate disease progression.

Indexed as

ImmunosenescenceMyositis, Inclusion BodyAutophagyHumansdegenerationIBMimmunosenescenceinflammationmyopathymyositispathogenesistreatment

Identifiers

PMID39504446
PMCPMC11879327

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.