Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504445›Full record

ArticleJMIR medical education2024

ChatGPT-4 Omni Performance in USMLE Disciplines and Clinical Skills: Comparative Analysis.

Brenton T Bicknell, Danner Butler, Sydney Whalen, James Ricks, Cory J Dixon, Abigail B Clark, Olivia Spaedy, Adam Skelton, Neel Edupuganti, Lance Dzubinski and 4 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07179861 (A Prospective, Cross-Sectional, Vignette-Based Observational Study Comparing Clinical Decision-Making Performance of Pediatriciansand AI Models), which is not on this map. Cited by 58 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
58citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07179861 completednot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

A Prospective, Cross-Sectional, Vignette-Based Observational Study Comparing Clinical Decision-Making Performance of Pediatriciansand AI Models

TypeobservationalSponsorHaseki Training and Research HospitalRan2025 to 2025Enrolled30ConditionsArtificial Intelligence (AI) in Diagnosis, Decision Support Systems, Clinical, Clinical Decision-making, PediatricsArmsAI Suggestions (Anonymized 5-tool panel), Confidence Rating Task (1-10 Likert)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

58 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. A Comparative Analysis of GPT-4o and ERNIE Bot in a Chinese Radiation Oncology Exam.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2026
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors.

Brenton T BicknellUAB Heersink School of Medicine, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, United States, 1 2566539498.ORCID 0009-0000-2101-2543
Danner ButlerUniversity of South Alabama Whiddon College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-0515-9162
Sydney WhalenUniversity of Illinois College of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States.ORCID 0009-0009-4744-1659
James RicksHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-1789-355X
Cory J DixonAlabama College of Osteopathic Medicine, Dothan, AL, United States.ORCID 0009-0000-7695-8504
Abigail B ClarkUT Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-6677-5560
Olivia SpaedySaint Louis University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, United States.ORCID 0009-0005-7795-0754
Adam SkeltonUAB Heersink School of Medicine, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, United States, 1 2566539498.ORCID 0009-0004-7258-2713
Neel EdupugantiMedical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, United States.ORCID 0009-0001-1409-9254
Lance DzubinskiUniversity of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus School of Medicine, Aurora, CO, United States.ORCID 0009-0008-8957-812X
Hudson TateUAB Heersink School of Medicine, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, United States, 1 2566539498.ORCID 0000-0003-1204-7415
Garrett DyessUniversity of South Alabama Whiddon College of Medicine, Mobile, AL, United States.ORCID 0009-0006-5774-6614
Brenessa LindemanUAB Heersink School of Medicine, 1670 University Blvd, Birmingham, AL, 35233, United States, 1 2566539498.ORCID 0000-0003-0818-6439
Lisa Soleymani LehmannHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.ORCID 0000-0001-8779-1244

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Recent studies, including those by the National Board of Medical Examiners, have highlighted the remarkable capabilities of recent large language models (LLMs) such as ChatGPT in passing the United States Medical Licensing Examination (USMLE). However, there is a gap in detailed analysis of LLM performance in specific medical content areas, thus limiting an assessment of their potential utility in medical education. Objective: This study aimed to assess and compare the accuracy of successive ChatGPT versions (GPT-3.5, GPT-4, and GPT-4 Omni) in USMLE disciplines, clinical clerkships, and the clinical skills of diagnostics and management. Methods: This study used 750 clinical vignette-based multiple-choice questions to characterize the performance of successive ChatGPT versions (ChatGPT 3.5 [GPT-3.5], ChatGPT 4 [GPT-4], and ChatGPT 4 Omni [GPT-4o]) across USMLE disciplines, clinical clerkships, and in clinical skills (diagnostics and management). Accuracy was assessed using a standardized protocol, with statistical analyses conducted to compare the models' performances. Results: GPT-4o achieved the highest accuracy across 750 multiple-choice questions at 90.4%, outperforming GPT-4 and GPT-3.5, which scored 81.1% and 60.0%, respectively. GPT-4o's highest performances were in social sciences (95.5%), behavioral and neuroscience (94.2%), and pharmacology (93.2%). In clinical skills, GPT-4o's diagnostic accuracy was 92.7% and management accuracy was 88.8%, significantly higher than its predecessors. Notably, both GPT-4o and GPT-4 significantly outperformed the medical student average accuracy of 59.3% (95% CI 58.3-60.3). Conclusions: GPT-4o's performance in USMLE disciplines, clinical clerkships, and clinical skills indicates substantial improvements over its predecessors, suggesting significant potential for the use of this technology as an educational aid for medical students. These findings underscore the need for careful consideration when integrating LLMs into medical education, emphasizing the importance of structured curricula to guide their appropriate use and the need for ongoing critical analyses to ensure their reliability and effectiveness.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetenceEducational MeasurementLicensure, MedicalClinical ClerkshipHumansUnited StatesAI in medical educationartificial intelligence in medicineChatGPTChatGPT 3.5ChatGPT 4ChatGPT 4 Omniclinical skillseducational technologylarge language modelLLMmedical educationmedical licensing examinationmedical student resourcesmedical studentsUnited States Medical Licensing ExaminationUSMLE

Identifiers

PMID39504445
PMCPMC11611793

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.