Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504386›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

A vessel bifurcation liver CT landmark pair dataset for evaluating deformable image registration algorithms.

Zhendong Zhang, Edward Robert Criscuolo, Yao Hao, Trevor McKeown, Deshan Yang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Zhendong ZhangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Edward Robert CriscuoloDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Yao HaoDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Trevor McKeownDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Deshan YangDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Duke University, Durham, North Carolina, USA.

Funding

Develop a large-scale library of comprehensive deformable image registration (DIR) benchmark datasets and an integrated framework for quantifying accuracy of patient-specific DIR resultsR01EB029431 · NIBIB · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI YANG, DESHAN · 2021 to 2021
$1.6M
National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) R01-EB029431NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB029431
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeEvaluating deformable image registration (DIR) algorithms is vital for enhancing algorithm performance and gaining clinical acceptance. However, there is a notable lack of dependable DIR benchmark datasets for assessing DIR performance except for lung images. To address this gap, we aim to introduce our comprehensive liver computed tomography (CT) DIR landmark dataset library. This dataset is designed for efficient and quantitative evaluation of various DIR methods for liver CTs, paving the way for more accurate and reliable image registration techniques. ACQUISITION AND VALIDATION

methodsForty CT liver image pairs were acquired from several publicly available image archives and authors' institutions under institutional review board (IRB) approval. The images were processed with a semi-automatic procedure to generate landmark pairs: (1) for each case, liver vessels were automatically segmented on one image; (2) landmarks were automatically detected at vessel bifurcations; (3) corresponding landmarks in the second image were placed using two deformable image registration methods to avoid algorithm-specific biases; (4) a comprehensive validation process based on quantitative evaluation and manual assessment was applied to reject outliers and ensure the landmarks' positional accuracy. This workflow resulted in an average of ∼56 landmark pairs per image pair, comprising a total of 2220 landmarks for 40 cases. The general landmarking accuracy of this procedure was evaluated using digital phantoms and manual landmark placement. The landmark pair target registration errors (TRE) on digital phantoms were 0.37 ± 0.26 and 0.55 ± 0.34 mm respectively for the two selected DIR algorithms used in our workflow, with 97% of landmark pairs having TREs below 1.5 mm. The distances from the calculated landmarks to the averaged manual placement were 1.27 ± 0.79 mm. DATA FORMAT AND USAGE NOTES: All data, including image files and landmark information, are publicly available at Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/records/13738577). Instructions for using our data can be found on our GitHub page at https://github.com/deshanyang/Liver-DIR-QA. POTENTIAL APPLICATIONS: The landmark dataset generated in this work is the first collection of large-scale liver CT DIR landmarks prepared on real patient images. This dataset can provide researchers with a dense set of ground truth benchmarks for the quantitative evaluation of DIR algorithms within the liver.

Indexed as

AlgorithmsImage Processing, Computer-AssistedLiverTomography, X-Ray ComputedHumansbenchmark datasetdeformable image registrationimage processing

Identifiers

PMID39504386
PMCPMC11915780

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.