Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504384›Full record

ArticleMedical physics2025

Monte Carlo modeling of a commercial machine and experimental setup for FLASH-minibeam irradiations with electrons.

Anthony Bonfrate, Maria Grazia Ronga, Annalisa Patriarca, Sophie Heinrich, Ludovic De Marzi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Medical physics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Anthony BonfrateInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France.
Maria Grazia RongaInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France.
Annalisa PatriarcaInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France.
Sophie HeinrichInstitut Curie - Research Center, U1021, Orsay, France.
Ludovic De MarziInstitut Curie, PSL Research University, Radiation Oncology Department, Proton Therapy Centre, Centre Universitaire, Orsay, France.

Funding

GENCI 2021-A0100312447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUltra-high dose rate (UHDR/FLASH) irradiations, along with particle minibeam therapy (PMBT) are both emerging as promising alternatives to current radiotherapy techniques thanks to their improved healthy tissue sparing and similar tumor control. PURPOSE: Monte Carlo (MC) modeling of a commercial machine delivering 5-7 MeV electrons at UHDR. This model was used afterward to compare measurements against simulations for an experimental setup combining both FLASH and PMBT modalities.

methodsWe modeled the main accelerator elements with TOPAS3.8/Geant4.10.07.p03, optimized the electron source parameters, and subsequently benchmarked this geometry against measurements. Minibeam experiments were performed by delivering 7 MeV electrons at UHDR on three different 65-mm thick brass collimators as manufactured for protons with a 400-µm slit width: single slit, 5 slits with a center-to-center (CTC) distance of 4 mm and 9 slits with CTC of 2 mm. Finally, complementary simulations were run by changing critical PMBT collimator parameters to assess their specific impact on peak-to-valley dose ratio (PVDR) as well as on the Bremsstrahlung photon contribution to the total dose.

resultsPercentage depth dose (PDD) distributions and lateral dose profiles showed a good agreement between simulations and measurements, with a maximum discrepancy of less than 4%. With the PMBT collimators in place, discrepancies between simulated and measured dose profiles, lateral and in-depth in peaks and valleys, were within 3%. High PVDR between 5 and 26 were observed until 4 mm in the phantom. During the experiments, a mean dose rate of 167 Gy/s and an instantaneous dose rate of 1.2 × 10

conclusionsThe validation of the MC model and the configuration of an electron FLASH-minibeam setup were successfully completed, paving the way for future radiobiological investigations.

Indexed as

ElectronsMonte Carlo MethodRadiotherapy, High-EnergyParticle AcceleratorsRadiation DosageRadiotherapy DosageRadiotherapy Planning, Computer-AssistedelectronsFLASHparticle minibeam therapyultra‐high dose rate

Identifiers

PMID39504384
PMCPMC11788234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.