Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504339›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Comparing random walks in graph embedding and link prediction.

Adilson Vital, Filipi Nascimento Silva, Diego Raphael Amancio

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Adilson VitalInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, USP, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.
Filipi Nascimento SilvaThe Observatory on Social Media (OSoMe), Indiana University, Bloomington, Indiana, United States of America.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9151-6517
Diego Raphael AmancioInstitute of Mathematics and Computer Science, USP, São Carlos, SP, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Random walks find extensive applications across various complex network domains, including embedding generation and link prediction. Despite the widespread utilization of random walks, the precise impact of distinct biases on embedding generation from sequence data and their subsequent effects on link prediction remain elusive. We conduct a comparative analysis of several random walk strategies, including the true self-avoiding random walk and the traditional random walk. We also analyze walks biased towards node degree and those with inverse node degree bias. Diverse adaptations of the node2vec algorithm to induce distinct exploratory behaviors were also investigated. Our empirical findings demonstrate that despite the varied behaviors inherent in these embeddings, only slight performance differences manifest in the context of link prediction. This implies the resilient recovery of network structure, regardless of the specific walk heuristic employed to traverse the network. Consequently, the results suggest that data generated from sequences governed by unknown mechanisms can be successfully reconstructed.

Identifiers

PMID39504339
PMCPMC11540220

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.