ArticlePloS one2024
Non-small cell lung cancer detection through knowledge distillation approach with teaching assistant.
Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- The Rise of Small Language Models in Healthcare: A Comprehensive Survey.Computer science review · 2026Article
- Multi-stage knowledge distillation with layer fusion-based deep learning approach for skin cancer classification.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibits a comparatively slower rate of metastasis in contrast to small cell lung cancer, contributing to approximately 85% of the global patient population. In this work, leveraging CT scan images, we deploy a knowledge distillation technique within teaching assistant (TA) and student frameworks for NSCLC classification. We employed various deep learning models, CNN, VGG19, ResNet152v2, Swin, CCT, and ViT, and assigned roles as teacher, teaching assistant and student. Evaluation underscores exceptional model performance in performance metrics achieved via cost-sensitive learning and precise hyperparameter (alpha and temperature) fine-tuning, highlighting the model's efficiency in lung cancer tumor prediction and classification. The applied TA (ResNet152) and student (CNN) models achieved 90.99% and 94.53% test accuracies, respectively, with optimal hyperparameters (alpha = 0.7 and temperature = 7). The implementation of the TA framework improves the overall performance of the student model. After obtaining Shapley values, explainable AI is applied with a partition explainer to check each class's contribution, further enhancing the transparency of the implemented deep learning techniques. Finally, a web application designed to make it user-friendly and classify lung types in recently captured images. The execution of the three-stage knowledge distillation technique proved efficient with significantly reduced trainable parameters and training time applicable for memory-constrained edge devices.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.