Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504337›Full record

ArticlePloS one2024

Few-shot learning for inference in medical imaging with subspace feature representations.

Jiahui Liu, Keqiang Fan, Xiaohao Cai, Mahesan Niranjan

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Jiahui LiuSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Keqiang FanSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.ORCID 0000-0002-9411-2892
Xiaohao CaiSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Mahesan NiranjanSchool of Electronics and Computer Science, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlike in the field of visual scene recognition, where tremendous advances have taken place due to the availability of very large datasets to train deep neural networks, inference from medical images is often hampered by the fact that only small amounts of data may be available. When working with very small dataset problems, of the order of a few hundred items of data, the power of deep learning may still be exploited by using a pre-trained model as a feature extractor and carrying out classic pattern recognition techniques in this feature space, the so-called few-shot learning problem. However, medical images are highly complex and variable, making it difficult for few-shot learning to fully capture and model these features. To address these issues, we focus on the intrinsic characteristics of the data. We find that, in regimes where the dimension of the feature space is comparable to or even larger than the number of images in the data, dimensionality reduction is a necessity and is often achieved by principal component analysis or singular value decomposition (PCA/SVD). In this paper, noting the inappropriateness of using SVD for this setting we explore two alternatives based on discriminant analysis (DA) and non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). Using 14 different datasets spanning 11 distinct disease types we demonstrate that at low dimensions, discriminant subspaces achieve significant improvements over SVD-based subspaces and the original feature space. We also show that at modest dimensions, NMF is a competitive alternative to SVD in this setting. The implementation of the proposed method is accessible via the following link.

Indexed as

Deep LearningAlgorithmsDiagnostic ImagingHumansImage Processing, Computer-AssistedNeural Networks, ComputerPattern Recognition, AutomatedPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID39504337
PMCPMC11540231

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.