ArticleAnesthesia and analgesia2025
Development and Validation of a Predictive Model for Maternal Cardiovascular Morbidity Events in Patients With Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy.
Article in Anesthesia and analgesia, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) are a major contributor to maternal morbidity, mortality, and accelerated cardiovascular (CV) disease. Comorbid conditions are likely important predictors of CV risk in pregnant people. Currently, there is no way to predict which people with HDP are at risk of acute CV complications. We developed and validated a predictive model for all CV events and for heart failure, renal failure, and cerebrovascular events specifically after HDP.
methodsModels were created using the Premier Healthcare Database. The inclusion criteria for the model dataset were delivery with an HDP with discharge from October 1, 2015 to December 31, 2020. Machine learning methods were used to derive predictive models of CV events occurring during delivery hospitalization (Index Model) or during readmission (Readmission Model) using a training set (60%) to estimate model parameters, a validation set (20%) to tune model hyperparameters and select a final model, and a test set (20%) to evaluate final model performance.
resultsThe total model cohort consisted of 553,658 deliveries with an HDP. A CV event occurred in 6501 (1.2%) of the delivery hospitalizations. Multilabel neural networks were selected for the Index Model and Readmission Model due to favorable performance compared to alternatives. This approach is designed for prediction of multiple events that share risk factors and may cooccur. The Index Model predicted all CV events with area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC) 0.878 and average precision (AP) 0.239 (cerebrovascular events: AUROC 0.941, heart failure: AUROC 0.898, and renal failure: AUROC 0.885). With a positivity threshold set to achieve ≥90% sensitivity, model specificity was 65.0%, 83.5%, 68.6%, and 65.6% for predicting all CV events, cerebrovascular events, heart failure, and renal failure, respectively. CV events within 1 year of delivery occurred in 3018 (0.6%) individuals. The Readmission Model predicted all CV events with AUROC 0.717 and AP 0.022 (renal failure: AUROC 0.748, heart failure: AUROC 0.734, and cerebrovascular events AUROC 0.698). Feature importance analysis indicated that the presence of chronic renal disease, cardiac disease, pulmonary hypertension, and preeclampsia with severe features had the greatest effect on the prediction of CV events.
conclusionsAmong individuals with HDP, our multilabel neural network model predicted CV events at delivery admission with good classification and events within 1 year of delivery with fair classification.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.