ArticleJASA express letters2024
Fundamental frequency predominantly drives talker differences in auditory brainstem responses to continuous speech.
Article in JASA express letters, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- A DEEP NEURAL NETWORK FOR PREDICTING CONTINUOUS HUMAN EEG ACROSS THE AUDITORY PATHWAY IN RESPONSE TO SOUND.ArXiv · 2026Article
- Evaluating neural encoding of prosody-related F0 changes in emotional speech using the speech FFR in normal-hearing adults.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- The auditory brainstem response to natural speech is not affected by selective attention.PLoS biology · 2025Article
- Article
- Comparing methods for deriving the auditory brainstem response to continuous speech in human listeners.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025Article
- The effect of speech masking on the human subcortical response to continuous speech.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024Article
- Optimal Parameters for Measuring Multiband Auditory Brainstem Responses to Continuous Speech.Trends in hearingArticle
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deriving human neural responses to natural speech is now possible, but the responses to male- and female-uttered speech have been shown to differ. These talker differences may complicate interpretations or restrict experimental designs geared toward more realistic communication scenarios. This study found that when a male talker and a female talker had the same fundamental frequency, auditory brainstem responses (ABRs) were very similar. Those responses became smaller and later with increasing fundamental frequency, as did click ABRs with increasing stimulus rates. Modeled responses suggested that the speech and click ABR differences were reasonably predicted by peripheral and brainstem processing of stimulus acoustics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.