Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504228›Full record

ArticleJMIR mental health2024

Building Mutually Beneficial Collaborations Between Digital Navigators, Mental Health Professionals, and Clients: Naturalistic Observational Case Study.

Carla Gorban, Sarah McKenna, Min K Chong, William Capon, Robert Battisti, Alison Crowley, Bradley Whitwell, Antonia Ottavio, Elizabeth M Scott, Ian B Hickie and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR mental health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Observational
  7. Article
  8. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Carla Gorban *Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Sydney, 2050, Australia, 61 (02) 9351 0774.ORCID 0009-0003-9568-1792
Sarah McKenna *Brain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Sydney, 2050, Australia, 61 (02) 9351 0774.ORCID 0000-0002-8560-6399
Min K ChongBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Sydney, 2050, Australia, 61 (02) 9351 0774.ORCID 0000-0003-4562-731X
William CaponBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Sydney, 2050, Australia, 61 (02) 9351 0774.ORCID 0000-0001-6500-9629
Robert BattistiMind Plasticity, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-9366-7872
Alison CrowleyMind Plasticity, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0000-8334-2134
Bradley WhitwellMind Plasticity, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0009-0004-8995-2696
Antonia OttavioHeadspace Bondi Junction, Sydney, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8307-6200
Elizabeth M ScottBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Sydney, 2050, Australia, 61 (02) 9351 0774.ORCID 0000-0003-3907-0324
Ian B HickieBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Sydney, 2050, Australia, 61 (02) 9351 0774.ORCID 0000-0001-8832-9895
Frank IorfinoBrain and Mind Centre, The University of Sydney, 94 Mallett Street, Sydney, 2050, Australia, 61 (02) 9351 0774.ORCID 0000-0003-1109-0972

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unlabelled: Despite the efficacy of digital mental health technologies (DMHTs) in clinical trials, low uptake and poor engagement are common in real-world settings. Accordingly, digital technology experts or "digital navigators" are increasingly being used to enhance engagement and shared decision-making between health professionals and clients. However, this area is relatively underexplored and there is a lack of data from naturalistic settings. In this paper, we report observational findings from the implementation of a digital navigator in a multidisciplinary mental health clinic in Sydney, Australia. The digital navigator supported clients and health professionals to use a measurement-based DMHT (the Innowell platform) for improved multidimensional outcome assessment and to guide personalized decision-making. Observational data are reported from implementation logs, platform usage statistics, and response rates to digital navigator emails and phone calls. Ultimately, support from the digital navigator led to improved data collection and clearer communications about goals for using the DMHT to track client outcomes; however, this required strong partnerships between health professionals, the digital navigator, and clients. The digital navigator helped to facilitate the integration of DMHT into care, rather than providing a stand-alone service. Thus, collaborations between health professionals and digital navigators are mutually beneficial and empower clients to be more engaged in their own care.

Indexed as

Mental Health ServicesCooperative BehaviorDigital TechnologyHealth PersonnelHumansclinical technology specialistdecision-makingdigital coachdigital mental healthdigital mental health technologydigital navigatorimplementationlived experiencemental healthmental health servicespoor engagementshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID39504228
PMCPMC11559438

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.