Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504123›Full record

ArticleThe Journal of physiology2024

Enhanced inhibitory input to triceps brachii in humans with spinal cord injury.

Carley L P Butler, Sina Sangari, Bing Chen, Monica A Perez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Journal of physiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carley L P ButlerShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Sina SangariShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Bing ChenShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.
Monica A PerezShirley Ryan AbilityLab, Chicago, IL, USA.

Funding

PATHOPHYSIOLOGY AND REHABILITATION OF NEURAL DYSFUNCTIONT32HD007418 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI Levi John Hargrove · 1992 to 2026
$6.5M
From Neural Control of Movement to Treatments for Spinal Cord InjuryR35NS122336 · NINDS · REHABILITATION INSTITUTE OF CHICAGO D/B/A SHIRLEY RYAN ABILITYLAB · PI Monica A Perez · 2021 to 2026
$3.6M
Maximizing Spike - Timing Dependent Plasticity after Spinal Cord InjuryI01RX001807 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI OUDEGA, MARTIN, PEREZ, MONICA A · 2016 to 2020
–
Grasping Function after Spinal Cord InjuryI01RX002474 · VA · MIAMI VA HEALTH CARE SYSTEM · PI PEREZ, MONICA A · 2018 to 2024
–
Spinal Cord Stimulation for Functional Recovery in Humans with TetraplegiaI01RX003715 · VA · EDWARD HINES JR VA HOSPITAL · PI PEREZ, MONICA A · 2022 to 2025
–
NICHD NIH HHS T32 HD007418NINDS NIH HHS R35 NS122336RRD VA I01 RX001807RRD VA I01 RX002474RRD VA I01 RX002848RRD VA I01 RX003715
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Most individuals with cervical spinal cord injury (SCI) show increased muscle weakness in the elbow extensor compared to elbow flexor muscles. Although this is a well-known functional deficit, the underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. To address this question, we measured the suppression of voluntary electromyographic activity (svEMG; a measurement thought to reflect changes in intracortical inhibition) by applying low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation over the arm representation of the primary motor cortex during 10% of isometric maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) into elbow flexion or extension in individuals with and without chronic cervical SCI. We found that the svEMG latency and duration were not different between the biceps and triceps brachii in controls but prolonged in the triceps in individuals with SCI. The svEMG area was larger in the triceps compared to the biceps in both groups and further increased in SCI participants, suggesting a pronounced intracortical inhibitory input during elbow extension. A negative correlation was found between svEMG area and MVCs indicating that control and SCI participants with lower svEMG area had larger MVCs. The svEMG area was not different between 5% and 30% of MVC, making it less probable that differences in muscle strength between groups contributed to our results. These findings support the existence of strong inhibitory input to corticospinal projections controlling elbow extensor compared to flexor muscles, which is more pronounced after chronic cervical SCI. KEY POINTS: After cervical spinal cord injury (SCI), people often recover function in elbow flexor, but much less in elbow extensor muscles. The neural mechanisms contributing to this difference remain unknown. We measured the suppression of voluntary electromyographic activity (svEMG) elicited through low-intensity transcranial magnetic stimulation of the primary motor cortex (assumed to reflect changes in intracortical inhibition) in the biceps and triceps muscles in controls and individuals with cervical chronic incomplete SCI. We found increased svEMG area in the triceps compared to the biceps in controls and SCI participants, with this measurement being even more pronounced in the triceps after SCI. The svEMG area correlated with maximal voluntary contraction values in both groups, suggesting the people with lesser inhibition had larger motor output. Our results support the presence of strong cortical inhibitory input to corticospinal projections controlling elbow extensor compared to elbow flexors muscles after cervical SCI.

Indexed as

Motor CortexMuscle, SkeletalSpinal Cord InjuriesTranscranial Magnetic StimulationAdultArmElbowElectromyographyEvoked Potentials, MotorFemaleHumansIsometric ContractionMaleMiddle AgedNeural Inhibitioncorticospinal tractelbow extension/flexioninhibitory interneuronsintracortical inhibitionneurophysiologyspinal cord injury

Identifiers

PMID39504123
PMCPMC11652259

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.