Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39504120›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2024

Insights From the Development of a Dynamic Consent Platform for the Australians Together Health Initiative (ATHENA) Program: Interview and Survey Study.

Eddy Xiong, Carissa Bonner, Amanda King, Zoltan Maxwell Bourne, Mark Morgan, Ximena Tolosa, Tony Stanton, Kim Greaves

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Eddy Xiong *School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Southport, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0009-0002-1299-6645
Carissa Bonner *Menzies Centre for Health Policy and Economics, School of Public Health, Faculty of Medicine and Health, University of Sydney, Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-4797-6460
Amanda King *The Australians Together Health Initiative Program (The ATHENA Program), Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-6070-4582
Zoltan Maxwell Bourne *The Australians Together Health Initiative Program (The ATHENA Program), Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0009-0001-5304-8038
Mark Morgan *Faculty of Health Sciences and Medicine, Bond University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7749-2427
Ximena Tolosa *Communicable Disease Branch, Queensland Department of Health, Herston, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-7775-0091
Tony Stanton *Department of Cardiology, Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7982-3170
Kim Greaves *The Australians Together Health Initiative Program (The ATHENA Program), Sunshine Coast University Hospital, Queensland Health, Birtinya, Queensland, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-5511-2486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDynamic consent has the potential to address many of the issues facing traditional paper-based or electronic consent, including enrolling informed and engaged participants in the decision-making process. The Australians Together Health Initiative (ATHENA) program aims to connect participants across Queensland, Australia, with new research opportunities. At its core is dynamic consent, an interactive and participant-centric digital platform that enables users to view ongoing research activities, update consent preferences, and have ongoing engagement with researchers.

objectiveThis study aimed to describe the development of the ATHENA dynamic consent platform within the framework of the ATHENA program, including how the platform was designed, its utilization by participants, and the insights gained.

methodsOne-on-one interviews were undertaken with consumers, followed by a workshop with health care staff to gain insights into the dynamic consent concept. Five problem statements were developed, and solutions were posed, from which a dynamic consent platform was constructed, tested, and used for implementation in a clinical trial. Potential users were randomly recruited from a pre-existing pool of 615 participants in the ATHENA program. Feedback on user platform experience was gained from a survey hosted on the platform.

resultsIn the 13 consumer interviews undertaken, participants were positive about dynamic consent, valuing privacy, ease of use, and adequate communication. Motivators for registration were feedback on data usage and its broader community benefits. Problem statements were security, trust and governance, ease of use, communication, control, and need for a scalable platform. Using the newly constructed dynamic consent platform, 99 potential participants were selected, of whom 67 (68%) were successfully recontacted. Of these, 59 (88%) agreed to be sent the platform, 44 (74%) logged on (indicating use), and 22 (57%) registered for the clinical trial. Survey feedback was favorable, with an average positive rating of 78% across all questions, reflecting satisfaction with the clarity, brevity, and flexibility of the platform. Barriers to implementation included technological and health literacy.

conclusionsThis study describes the successful development and testing of a dynamic consent platform that was well-accepted, with users recognizing its advantages over traditional methods of consent regarding flexibility, ease of communication, and participant satisfaction. This information may be useful to other researchers who plan to use dynamic consent in health care research.

Indexed as

Informed ConsentAdultAgedAustralasian PeopleAustraliaFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedQueenslandSurveys and Questionnairesclinical trialscommunicationconsumer engagementdecisiondecision makingdevelopmentdigital consentdynamic consentfeedbackresearchuser platformusers

Identifiers

PMID39504120
PMCPMC11579620

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.