ArticleInvestigative ophthalmology & visual science2024
Determining the Relationship Between Corneal Stiffening and Tissue Dehydration After Corneal Cross-Linking.
Article in Investigative ophthalmology & visual science, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Digital transformation of care for keratoconus patients: ML modeling structural outcomes of corneal collagen cross-linking.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
- Brillouin microscopy for focal biomechanical measurements in normal and keratoconic corneas: A narrative review.Survey of ophthalmologyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose: To quantify corneal cross-linking (CXL)-induced stiffening via mechanical testing to estimate the impact of changes in hydration levels (H) and evaluate depth-dependent tissue hydration after CXL. Methods: Eighty-three porcine corneal buttons were divided into three groups: Standard protocol CXL (S-CXL), accelerated CXL (A-CXL), and untreated (nonirradiated riboflavin-only) controls. Samples were hydrated or dehydrated to modulate H and dynamic mechanical analyzer compression tests were performed to measure Young's modulus (E). To extract the solid tissue network modulus, the cornea was modeled as a biphasic material after measuring E at different H. Corneal hydration was correlated with depth-dependent tissue thickness characterized by confocal reflection microscopy (CRM). Results: Young's modulus increased fourfold after S-CXL (0.72 ± 0.1 MPa) and threefold after A-CXL E (0.53 ± 0.12 MPa) versus controls (0.17 ± 0.045 MPa). However, H decreased from 4.07 ± 0.35 in controls to 2.06 ± 0.2 after S-CXL and 2.79 ± 0.12 after A-CXL. After H modulation and biphasic mechanical modeling, Young's modulus for corneal solid tissue network showed only a 1.8-fold increase after S-CXL (2.25 MPa) and 1.5-fold increase after A-CXL (1.85 MPa) versus controls (1.22 MPa). With CRM, the overall thickness of the corneal tissue was found to linearly correlate to hydration H as expected. No appreciable depth dependence of hydration-induced thickness changes throughout the corneal buttons were observed. Conclusions: Corneal tissue hydration changes significantly impact measured corneal stiffness after CXL using mechanical testing. Not considering H leads to major overestimation of the stiffening effect of the CXL procedure. Depth-dependence of corneal thickness because of changing hydration is strongly dependent on the integrity of the tissue.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.