ArticleJAMA network open2024
Risk Score for Hepatocellular Cancer in Adults Without Viral Hepatitis or Cirrhosis.
Article in JAMA network open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Validation of Texas Hepatocellular Carcinoma Consortium Risk Index in the Hepatocellular Carcinoma Early Detection Strategy Study.Clinical gastroenterology and hepatology : the official clinical practice journal of the American Gastroenterological Association · 2026Article
- Liver cancer risk stratification using deep learning on nationwide longitudinal health screening data: a retrospective cohort study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Errors in the Results, Tables, and Supplement.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- An AUDacious Proposal: How to Improve Gastroenterology Fellow Training for Alcohol Use Disorder and Alcohol-Associated Liver Disease.Digestive diseases and sciences · 2025Article
- Adaptation of Risk Score for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Without Alcohol Measures.JAMA network open · 2025Article
- Association between glycemic control and hepatocellular carcinoma risk in people with type 2 diabetes, stratified by chronic hepatitis B or C infection.Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology · 2025Article
- A comprehensive analysis of vasculogenic mimicry related genes to predict the survival rate of HCC and its influence on the tumor microenvironment.Frontiers in genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Importance: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is typically detected only at advanced stages when treatment options are limited. Most of the current HCC risk models focus on patients with viral hepatitis or diagnosed cirrhosis or require variables not routinely available in clinical care. Objective: To identify modifiable HCC risk factors in the general population and to develop a risk score to inform HCC screening and risk-factor modification interventions for high-risk individuals without viral hepatitis or decompensated cirrhosis. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study analyzed demographic, clinical, laboratory, and diagnostic data from the US Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) electronic health records. Data were divided into development and validation samples. Veterans aged 30 to 95 years were included, and those with hepatitis B or C virus infection, hepatic decompensation, or prevalent HCC were excluded. Patients were followed up until the occurrence of HCC diagnosis, death, or December 31, 2021. A Cox proportional hazards regression model for 10-year risk of HCC was developed and used to create an HCC risk score, and performance in development and validation samples and in patient subgroups was evaluated. One outpatient visit date per person at least 18 months after VA entry, between October 1, 2007, and March 31, 2020, was randomly selected and used as the index date for the start of follow-up. Analyses were performed from March 2023 to May 2024. Exposures: Age, sex, race and ethnicity, body mass index, liver fibrosis (detected with Fibrosis-4 Index [FIB-4]), diabetes status, smoking status, and alcohol use. Main Outcomes and Measures: First HCC diagnosis during follow-up. This information was ascertained from VA national cancer registry topography and histology codes and from International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision and International Statistical Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, Clinical Modification diagnosis codes for the inpatient or outpatient visits. Results: This study of 6 509 288 veterans included 6 048 917 males (92.9%), with a median (IQR) age of 65 (54-74) years, who identified as being of Hispanic (5.3%), non-Hispanic Black (15.0%), non-Hispanic White (68.9%), or other (4.6%) race and ethnicity. Overall, 15 142 patients (0.2%) developed HCC, 69.5% of whom had FIB-4 of 3.25 or lower at baseline. While FIB-4 was the most important variable, age, sex, race and ethnicity, body mass index, diabetes, smoking, and alcohol use were also informative. Discrimination in the development sample was better than FIB-4 alone (C statistic, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.82-0.85] vs 0.79 [95% CI, 0.77-0.80]). The HCC risk score performed consistently well in the validation sample and in all subgroups. A FIB-4 threshold of 3.25 would screen 5.0% of the cohort at a cost of 28 false-positives for every true-positive; a model risk score of 58 would screen 4.7% of the cohort at a cost of 23 false-positives for every true-positive. Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this study suggest that a multivariable risk score that uses routinely available clinical data outperforms FIB-4 alone in identifying patients at risk of HCC who do not have viral hepatitis or hepatic decompensation at baseline.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.