Trial reportJournal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.)2025
Efficacy of Olmesartan/Amlodipine Single-Pill Combination on 24-h Mean Systolic Blood Pressure Measured by Ambulatory Monitoring in Non-Responders to Valsartan or Candesartan Monotherapy.
Trial report in Journal of clinical hypertension (Greenwich, Conn.), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT01713920 (Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Antihypertensive Drug in Non-Responders to Angiotensin Receptor Blocker), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Antihypertensive Drug in Non-Responders to Angiotensin Receptor Blocker(ARB) monoTHerapy Using 24h ABPM.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of olmesartan/amlodipine (OLM/AML) single-pill combination (SPC) therapy using ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM) in non-responders to valsartan or candesartan monotherapy. Isolated systolic hypertension (ISH) is the most prevalent form of hypertension in middle-aged and elderly individuals. Patients aged over 55 years who did not achieve the target systolic blood pressure (SBP < 140 mmHg) with valsartan 80 mg or candesartan 8 mg for at least 4 weeks were included. Doses were escalated from 20/5 mg to 40/5 mg and finally to 40/10 mg of OLM/AML SPC until patients reached the target SBP. Efficacy was assessed via ABPM by comparing baseline values with those in the 12th week. Office blood pressure (OBP) and brachial-ankle pulse wave velocity (baPWV) were assessed at baseline, weeks 4, 8, and 12. Fifty-four patients (average age 64 ± 6 years; 33 males) participated. The 24-h mean BPs decreased significantly from an average of 146.2 ± 12.7/93.3 ± 9.2 mmHg to 129.7 ± 14.3/83.4 ± 10.7 mmHg (p < 0.001), and pulse pressures (PPs) from ABPM were reduced (p < 0.001). Additionally, significant reductions in night-time SBP standard deviations (SDs) (14.7 ± 4.7 vs. 12.5 ± 3.9, p = 0.029) were observed at 12 weeks compared to baseline. OBPs significantly dropped from 151.1 ± 9.7/89.3 ± 8.3 mmHg to 125.5 ± 13.8/77.8 ± 8.8 mmHg after 12 weeks of SPC therapy (p < 0.001). Reductions in PPs of OBP and baPWVs were also observed. OLM/AML SPC therapy effectively reduced the 24-h mean BP, as measured by ABPM, in hypertensive patients over 55 years old who failed to achieve a target SBP (< 140 mmHg) with angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB) monotherapy using valsartan 80 mg or candesartan 8 mg. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01713920.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.