Observational studyInternal and emergency medicine2025
Diagnostic value of systematic compression ultrasonography for the detection of unrecognized venous thromboembolism in patients admitted to an internal medicine ward for dyspnea.
Observational study in Internal and emergency medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The diagnosis of venous thromboembolism (VTE) is complex, and many cases of pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep vein thrombosis (DVT) go undetected despite validated diagnostic algorithms. This study evaluated the diagnostic performance of compression ultrasound (CUS) when systematically performed in patients admitted to an internal medicine department for dyspnea and/or respiratory failure. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of consecutive adult hospitalized patients admitted for dyspnea and/or respiratory failure with at least one of the following: tachycardia (> 100 bpm), tachypnea (> 20/min), chest pain, cough, syncope, or hemoptysis. Patients with a previous diagnosis of VTE or who underwent computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) or CUS during evaluation in the emergency department were excluded. The study included 263 patients (50.2% women, average age 84 years). CUS was positive in 31 patients (11.8%); Bilateral DVT was diagnosed in two patients and unilateral DVT in 29 patients. Of these, 10 underwent CT scan, with PE confirmed in 9 cases. Using the Wells score for DVT (cut-off ≥ 2), only 8 patients (25.8%) were at high risk. The accuracy of the Wells score in identifying PE was suboptimal, as 5 of 9 patients (55.5%) with confirmed PE were in the low-risk group (three-level interpretation) and 8 (89.9%) were in the "EP unlikely" group (two-level interpretation). The systematic use of CUS as a point-of-care tool can improve the diagnostic accuracy for VTE in patients admitted to internal medicine departments with dyspnea/respiratory failure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.