Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39503957›Full record

ArticleHealth & justice2024

Pre and post diagnostic dementia care in four Scottish prisons.

Rhoda MacRae, Natalie Chalmers, Debbie Tolson, James Taylor, Kirstin Anderson, Lindsay Thomson, Tom Russ

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health & justice, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Rhoda MacRaeAlzheimer Scotland Centre for Policy and Practice, School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Lanarkshire Campus, Glasgow, G72 0LH, Scotland. rhoda.macrae@uws.ac.uk.
Natalie ChalmersSchool of Health in Social Science, The University of Edinburgh, Teviot Place, Edinburgh, EH8 9AG, Scotland.
Debbie TolsonAlzheimer Scotland Centre for Policy and Practice, School of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland, Lanarkshire Campus, Glasgow, G72 0LH, Scotland.
James TaylorSchool of Health and Life Sciences, University of the West of Scotland , Lanarkshire Campus, Edinburgh, G72 0LH, Scotland.
Kirstin AndersonEdinburgh Napier University, Sighthill Campus, Edinburgh, EH11 4BN, Scotland.
Lindsay ThomsonCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL, Scotland.
Tom RussCentre for Clinical Brain Sciences, Division of Psychiatry, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, EH8 9YL, Scotland.

Funding

Dunhill Medical Trust RPGF/2006\236
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

background and purposeThe number of older people in prisons is increasing across the globe. Many have poor physical and mental health, higher prevalence of head injury, cognitive impairment and dementia than found in community populations. Meeting the complex needs of this vulnerable group has become an increasing concern for prison and prison healthcare services. The aim of this multi method qualitative study was to investigate how men with diagnosed or suspected dementia were identified, assessed, and cared for in Scottish prisons. It also explored the lived experience of individuals being assessed for or diagnosed with dementia within four prisons. The data from twenty nine interviews was thematically analysed and used to collaboratively propose principles for dementia care in prison and present the resultant co-designed care pathway.

resultsAt the time of data collection almost all the men known to have a dementia diagnosis or suspected dementia had complex health and social care needs, and some were living with advanced dementia. Prison healthcare staff reported taking a 'case by case' approach to their pre- and post-diagnostic care. Meeting these prisoner's needs was complicated by the absence of organisational leads for care of older adults or people with dementia and there was no pathway or model in place to guide staff. Prison healthcare teams often had difficulty accessing specialist community services to support diagnosis. There was a lack of dementia education and knowledge about how to provide pre and post diagnostic dementia care in this setting amongst staff. The findings arising from this research have informed the co-production of two important evidence informed innovations namely a Model of Care and a pre- and post-diagnostic Care Pathway.

conclusionThis research adds insights critical to understanding the adequacy of current approaches to meeting dementia related needs within the prison setting. To our knowledge this paper offers the first co-produced evidence informed pre- and post- diagnostic dementia care pathway and model of care for use in prisons. These could serve as tools for change that could enable prison healthcare staff to deliver the right care, at the right time, by the right people, and provide an opportunity to assess risk and plan care for the future.

Indexed as

Care pathwayDementiaOlder Prisoners

Identifiers

PMID39503957
PMCPMC11539670

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.