ArticleArchives of dermatological research2024
Gender, race, and economic factors influencing screening practices in hidradenitis suppurativa: a cross-sectional analysis.
Article in Archives of dermatological research, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Patient journey and disparities in the diagnosis and treatment of patients with hidradenitis suppurativa.JID innovations : skin science from molecules to population health · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a chronic inflammatory skin condition that significantly impacts patients' quality of life. Despite its substantial burden, HS remains underdiagnosed and undertreated, particularly among marginalized populations. This study aimed to elucidate the primary social determinants of health (SDOH) and structural determinants of health (StDOH) influencing rates and patterns of screening for patients diagnosed with HS. Using data from the All of Us Research Program database, participants with HS were identified using ICD-10 codes and stratified based on various sociodemographic factors, including race, gender, and income. The primary outcome variables were participation in viral screening and disease screening among HS patients. Statistical analyses were performed to assess the relationship between sociodemographic factors and screening practices. Income and gender had significant impacts on screening practices. Higher-income patients were more likely to receive necessary disease screening and less likely to receive unnecessary disease screening compared to lower-income patients. Non-male patients had significantly higher rates of unnecessary disease and viral screening than male patients. While differences in screening practices within each income level were significant, there were no significant differences across different income brackets or racial groups. These findings suggest that subjectivity associated with individual physicians' recommendations may contribute to disparities in screening outcomes, especially in lower-income and non-male HS patients. The study highlights the need for more clearly delineated screening guidelines and continued research on the role of SDOH in improving patient health outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39503954What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.