SynthesisNeurosurgical review2024
Prognostic value of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging findings in acute traumatic brain injury in prediction of poor neurological outcome and mortality: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Neurosurgical review, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Quantitative CT biomarkers for early outcome prediction in acute traumatic brain injury: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.Emergency radiology · 2026Pooled it
- Comparative predictive performance of computed tomography scoring systems in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review, Bayesian comparison, and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2026Pooled it
- Diagnostic and prognostic role of serum/plasma and CSF amyloid beta peptide levels in traumatic brain injury: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Neurosurgical review · 2025Pooled it
- Artificial hibernation: A new technique for protecting neural tissue and organs.Neural regeneration research · 2026Article
- Article
- Treatment-Limiting Decisions in Neurointensive Care: Withholding or Withdrawal of Life-Sustaining Measures.Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica · 2026Observational
- Association of Marshall CT Scores with GFAP, UCH-L1, Tau, NfL, and p-Tau231 After Traumatic Brain Injury.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality, impacting healthcare systems and economies. Early identification of poor outcomes is crucial for effective treatment. This systematic review assesses the prognostic value of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings in predicting poor neurological outcomes and mortality in the acute phase of TBI. A comprehensive search of Scopus, MEDLINE, and Web of science databases was performed to identify studies examining CT and MR-based imaging findings and their association with poor outcomes as assessed by Glasgow outcome score as well as mortality within the early acute phase of TBI following injury/admission. Qualitative evaluation of included studies revealed several imaging sequences that modify the outcome of the patients, including extra-axial and intra-axial hemorrhage, swirl sign, contrast extravasation, midline shift, closed and open cranial cisterns, signs of edema, presence of cranial fractures, intracranial hemorrhage, cerebral microbleeds, diffuse axonal injury, apparent diffusion coefficient and fractional anisotropy in diffusion tensor imaging, as well as, concentrations of brain metabolites(N-acetyl aspartate, Creatinine, Choline, Myo-inositol, glutamate, and glutamine) in magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Among these markers, subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH) and subdural hematoma (SDH) emerged as the most predictive of poor outcomes based on meta-analysis findings. SAH was significantly associated with an increased risk of mortality (OR: 3.35, 95% CI: 2.41-4.65, I²=51.3%) and poor outcomes (OR: 2.69, 95% CI: 2.44-2.96, I²=0%). Similarly, SDH correlated with higher mortality risk (OR: 2.44, 95% CI: 2.14-2.78, I²=0%) and worse outcomes (OR: 2.00, 95% CI: 1.12-3.59, I²=60.9%). In contrast, epidural hematoma (EDH) was linked to better outcomes (OR: 0.60, 95% CI: 0.52-0.68, I²=0%) but not significantly associated with mortality (OR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.09-1.65, I²=73.7%). The results of this systematic review and meta-analysis provide an overview of clinically feasible imaging markers of prognostic value and may inform clinical decision-making in the future.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39503919What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.