Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39503915›Full record

ArticleSports medicine - open2024

Morning versus Nocturnal Heart Rate and Heart Rate Variability Responses to Intensified Training in Recreational Runners.

Olli-Pekka Nuuttila, Heikki Kyröläinen, Veli-Pekka Kokkonen, Arja Uusitalo

Erratum issuedAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Sports medicine - open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Olli-Pekka NuuttilaFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (VIV), Jyväskylä, FIN-40014, Finland. olli-pekka.s.nuuttila@jyu.fi.
Heikki KyröläinenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (VIV), Jyväskylä, FIN-40014, Finland.
Veli-Pekka KokkonenFaculty of Sport and Health Sciences, University of Jyväskylä, P.O. Box 35 (VIV), Jyväskylä, FIN-40014, Finland.
Arja UusitaloDepartment of Sports and Exercise Medicine, Clinicum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland.

Funding

Polar Electro Oy Polar Electro OyThe Finnish Sports Research Foundation The Finnish Sports Research FoundationThe Foundation of Sports Institute The Foundation of Sports Institute
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundResting heart rate (HR) and HR variability (HRV) are widely used parameters to assess cardiac autonomic nervous system function noninvasively. While resting assessments can be performed during sleep or after awakening, it would be relevant to know how interchangeable the results of these measurements are. This study aimed at examining the alignment between nocturnal and morning assessments during regular endurance training and in response to intensive training. A total of 24 recreational runners performed a 3-week baseline period (BL) and a 2-week overload (OL) period (Lucia's training impulse + 80%). Their running performance was assessed with a 3000-m running test after the BL and OL. The participants recorded daily their nocturnal HR and HRV (the natural logarithm of the root mean square of successive differences; LnRMSSD) with a photoplethysmography-based wrist device and performed an orthostatic test (2-min supine, 2-min standing) every morning with a chest-strap HR sensor. The HR and LnRMSSD segments that were analyzed from the nocturnal recordings included start value (SleepStart), end value (SleepEnd), first 4-h segment 30 min after detected sleep onset (Sleep4h), and full sleep time (SleepFull). The morning segments consisted of the last-minute average in both body positions. All segments were compared at BL and in response to the 3000-m test and OL.

resultsAll nocturnal HR and LnRMSSD segments correlated with supine and standing segments at BL (r = 0.42 to 0.91, p < 0.05). After the 3000-m test, the HR increased and LnRMSSD decreased only in the SleepStart, Sleep4h, and SleepFull segments (p < 0.05). In response to the OL, the standing HR decreased (p < 0.01), while the LnRMSSD increased (p < 0.05) in all segments except for SleepStart. The Pearson correlations between relative changes in nocturnal and morning segments were - 0.11 to 0.72 (3000-m) and - 0.25 to 0.79 (OL). The OL response in Sleep4h HR and LnRMSSD correlated with the relative change in 3000-m time (r = 0.63, p = 0.001 and r=-0.50, p = 0.013, respectively).

conclusionsNocturnal and morning HR and LnRMSSD correlated moderately or highly in the majority of cases during the BL, but their responses to intensive training were not similarly aligned, especially in LnRMSSD. The nocturnal segments seemed to be sensitive to physical loading, and their responses were associated with the performance-related training responses.

Indexed as

Autonomic nervous systemEndurance trainingOrthostatic testOverloadParasympathetic nervous system

Identifiers

PMID39503915
PMCPMC11541970

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.