Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39503853›Full record

ArticleSocial psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology2025

Access to psychological therapies amongst patients with a mental health diagnosis in primary care: a data linkage study.

Raquel Catalao, Matthew Broadbent, Mark Ashworth, Jayati Das-Munshi, Stephani L Hatch, Matthew Hotopf, Sarah Dorrington

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Raquel CatalaoDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK. Raquel.catalao@kcl.ac.uk.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3672-6359
Matthew BroadbentNIHR Maudsley Biomedical Research Centre, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK.
Mark AshworthSchool of Population Health and Environmental Sciences, King's College London, London, UK.
Jayati Das-MunshiDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.
Stephani L HatchDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.
Matthew HotopfDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.
Sarah DorringtonDepartment of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College, London, UK.

Funding

Wellcome Trust
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeSignificant numbers of people in England have fallen into a gap between primary care psychological therapies and specialist mental health services. We aim to examine pathways to care by looking at demographic variation in detection and referral to primary and secondary psychological services in south London.

methodsLongitudinal descriptive study using a record linkage between a primary care database (Lambeth DataNet) and a secondary care mental health database (CRIS). We extracted data on mental health diagnosis, prescriptions and episodes of care in mental health services for all patients of working age registered from 1 January 2008 to 1 March 2018 (pre-covid era).

resultsOf those with a mental disorder detected in primary care (n = 110,419; 26.8%); 33.7% (n = 37,253) received no treatment; 21.3% (n = 23,548) exclusively accessed psychological treatment within NHS Talking Therapies and 7.6% accessed secondary care psychological therapies. People from minoritised groups were more likely to be prescribed psychotropic medication as the only treatment offered compared to the White British group. Men, Black African and Asian groups were less likely to access NHS Talking Therapies. People with a personality disorder diagnosis had the highest prevalence and number of NHS Talking Therapies treatment episodes (48.0%, n = 960), a similar percentage (44.1%, n = 881) received secondary care psychology treatment.

conclusionOur study highlights marked inequalities in access to psychological therapies for men and people from some minoritised ethnic groups across primary and secondary care and how individuals with personality disorders are offered multiple short-term courses in NHS Talking Therapies even where this is not recommended treatment.

Indexed as

Health Services AccessibilityMental DisordersMental Health ServicesPrimary Health CarePsychotherapyAdolescentAdultFemaleHumansLondonLongitudinal StudiesMaleMiddle AgedReferral and ConsultationSecondary Health CareYoung AdultEthnicityInequalitiesPopulation healthPsychological therapies

Identifiers

PMID39503853
PMCPMC12378146

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.