Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39503849›Full record

ReviewHNO2025

[Unmet medical needs in otorhinolaryngology].

Helmut Schaaf, Georg Kastellis, Gerhard Hesse

Abstract readEnglish AbstractReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in HNO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Helmut SchaafTinnitus Klinik Dr.Hesse am Krankenhaus BadArolsen, Große Allee 50, 34454, Bad Arolsen, Deutschland. HSchaaf@tinnitus-klinik.net.
Georg KastellisTinnitus Klinik Dr.Hesse am Krankenhaus BadArolsen, Große Allee 50, 34454, Bad Arolsen, Deutschland.
Gerhard HesseTinnitus Klinik Dr.Hesse am Krankenhaus BadArolsen, Große Allee 50, 34454, Bad Arolsen, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Unfulfilled medical wishes and the resulting disappointments often have infrastructural causes and are the result of inadequate services or limited available resources in a medical practice. As annoying as these might be, they can hardly be influenced by the individual therapeutic competence of the ENT physician. The situation is different in the case of unfulfilled medical wishes of patients who cannot be adequately helped for a variety of reasons, whether because of the severity of their illness or because of the particular, predominantly psychosomatic constellations. This can lead to disappointment and unfulfilled expectations on both sides. This article focuses on diseases for which there are no clear organic findings and therefore no clear treatment options, such as surgery or medication, or in which the organic findings are tangible but do not sufficiently explain the underlying condition. In such cases, the treatment measures initiated are not sufficient and do not satisfy the patient. The patient feels misunderstood, which puts additional strain on the relationship between physician and patient. A basic psychosomatic understanding of underlying and subjectively dominant organic complaints-by physicians and patients-is helpful here. In this way, the symptom can also be understood and recognized as a possible expression of psychogenic distress in order to pave way to the necessary initiation of causal therapy. The article is intended to reflect on this and make suggestions for dealing with the topic, using the example of tinnitus suffering in particular.

Indexed as

Health Services Needs and DemandNeeds AssessmentOtolaryngologyOtorhinolaryngologic DiseasesPsychophysiologic DisordersGermanyHumansPhysician-Patient RelationsHealthcare infrastructureNeurotologyPsychosomatic disordersPsychosomatic medicineTinnitus

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.