ReviewHNO2025
[Unmet medical needs in otorhinolaryngology].
Review in HNO, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Beyond the face: multidimensional care challenges and unmet needs in Hemifacial Microsomia families.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Unfulfilled medical wishes and the resulting disappointments often have infrastructural causes and are the result of inadequate services or limited available resources in a medical practice. As annoying as these might be, they can hardly be influenced by the individual therapeutic competence of the ENT physician. The situation is different in the case of unfulfilled medical wishes of patients who cannot be adequately helped for a variety of reasons, whether because of the severity of their illness or because of the particular, predominantly psychosomatic constellations. This can lead to disappointment and unfulfilled expectations on both sides. This article focuses on diseases for which there are no clear organic findings and therefore no clear treatment options, such as surgery or medication, or in which the organic findings are tangible but do not sufficiently explain the underlying condition. In such cases, the treatment measures initiated are not sufficient and do not satisfy the patient. The patient feels misunderstood, which puts additional strain on the relationship between physician and patient. A basic psychosomatic understanding of underlying and subjectively dominant organic complaints-by physicians and patients-is helpful here. In this way, the symptom can also be understood and recognized as a possible expression of psychogenic distress in order to pave way to the necessary initiation of causal therapy. The article is intended to reflect on this and make suggestions for dealing with the topic, using the example of tinnitus suffering in particular.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39503849What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.