Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39503838›Full record

ArticleJournal of echocardiography2025

Global, segmental, and layer-specific two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography immediately after acute myocardial infarction as a predictive tool to assess myocardial viability and scar size.

B R Van Klarenbosch, H E Driessen, F P Kirkels, M J Cramer, B K Velthuis, M A Vos, S A J Chamuleau, S Ter Meulen-De Jong, A J Teske

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of echocardiography, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

B R Van KlarenboschDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands. B.R.vanKlarenbosch-2@umcutrecht.nl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7064-2891
H E DriessenDepartment of Medical Physiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
F P KirkelsDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M J CramerDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
B K VelthuisDepartment of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
M A VosDepartment of Medical Physiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
S A J ChamuleauDepartment of Cardiology, Amsterdam University Medical Center, Meibergdreef 9, 1105AZ, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
S Ter Meulen-De JongDepartment of Medical Physiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
A J TeskeDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimThe identification of myocardial scar is key in clinical decision-making after acute myocardial infarction (AMI). However, the gold standard that is cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR) encounters limitations in terms of availability. Two-dimensional speckle tracking echocardiography (2D-STE) may be an accessible alternative in detecting scar and assessing scar transmurality. We aim to evaluate the predictive value of 2D-STE, encompassing measures of global, segmental and layer-specific strain, with respect to myocardial viability and scar size at 6 months follow-up. METHODS AND

resultsIn 43 patients admitted for primary AMI, we conducted a comparative analysis of strain parameters (including global longitudinal strain (GLS), segmental longitudinal strain (SLS), layer-specific GLS and SLS and the transmural strain gradient from endocardium to epicardium) in relation to conventional echocardiographic parameters at baseline in predicting for scar size and the transmurality index, as measured by CMR, 6 months post enrollment. We demonstrate a moderate correlation between both GLS and conventional echocardiographic parameters, and scar size as well as transmurality index. Wall motion score index exhibited superior predictive performance over GLS and left ventricular ejection fraction in anticipating scar formation. At a cut-off of - 13.3% for any scar and - 11.5% for transmural scar, SLS can predict scar formation. Layer-specific strain did not provide added predictive value.

conclusionSLS, but not layer-specific strain, during admission after AMI is an easy and accessible quantitative tool for predicting scar formation and transmurality extent at 6 months follow-up. GLS correlates well with scar size, suggesting its potential utility as a predictive tool.

Indexed as

CicatrixEchocardiographyMyocardial InfarctionMyocardiumAgedFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedPredictive Value of TestsStroke VolumeCardiac magnetic resonance imagingInfarctionScarSpeckle trackingStrainTransmurality

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.