ArticleJapanese journal of radiology2025
Optimizing normal tissue objectives (NTO) in eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) for stereotactic treatment of multiple brain metastases using non-coplanar RapidArc and comparison with HyperArc techniques.
Article in Japanese journal of radiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparative evaluation of normal tissue objective functions in robotic radiosurgery planning for solitary brain tumors.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2025Article
- Optimization of Normal Tissue Objectives (NTO) in HyperArc Radiosurgery for Brain Oligometastases: A Systematic Analysis of the Trade-Offs among Dosimetric Quality, Plan Complexity, and Treatment Efficiency.Technology in cancer research & treatmentArticle
- Normal Tissue Objective Parameter Optimization in Eclipse Treatment Planning System: Enhancing Stereotactic Radiosurgery Quality with Noncoplanar RapidArc versus HyperArc Plans.Journal of medical physicsArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposeTo optimize NTO parameters in non-coplanar RapidArc (RA) stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for multiple brain metastases and compare them with HyperArc (HA) plans. MATERIALS AND
methodsThirty patients with multiple brain metastases, receiving 21 Gy prescriptions, were retrospectively enrolled, with lesions ranging from two to eight and volumes between 0.27 and 10.56 cm
resultsRA-mNTO plans with 0.5 mm⁻
conclusionNon-coplanar RA plans with optimized mNTO settings outperformed HyperArc plans in all studied dosimetric parameters for SRS treatment of multiple brain metastases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39503823What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.