ArticleThe Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology2024
Left ventricular perforation by Impella 5.5 during surgery for postinfarction ventricular septal rupture.
Article in The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Unexpected rupture of the left ventricular wall following surgical repair of post-infarction ventricular septal rupture in a patient supported by Impella CP: a case report.European heart journal. Case reports · 2026Article
- Surgically implanted temporary ventricular assist pump - "Impella 5.5".Indian journal of thoracic and cardiovascular surgery · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe perioperative use of the Impella 5.5 has been increasing recently; however, the left ventricular perforation by this device during surgery has not been reported to date. CASE PRESENTATION: Postinfarction ventricular septal rupture in a 75-year-old man was successfully repaired with support of a single Impella 5.5 device used for consecutive 28 days perioperatively. The patient underwent surgery after 16 days of Impella support. During surgery, the Impella was left in place expecting its use for left ventricular unloading after the operation. After aortic cross-clamp, when the apex was carefully lifted, the tip of the Impella almost protruded from the posterior wall, and could be seen through the epicardium. The aorta was unclamped briefly, the Impella was pulled out several centimeters, and the aorta was cross-clamped again. The ventricular septal rupture was repaired by the double-layer patch technique via the right ventricle. Immediately before the chest closure, the free wall of the LV ruptured and blood rapidly flowed out. It was where the Impella almost protruded during cardiac arrest, and was repaired with a pledgeted monofilament mattress suture.
conclusionsA single device can be used throughout perioperative periods; however, if used during surgery, possible risk of left ventricular perforation should be well recognized since the device has no soft pigtail part at its end, and its stiff tip can directly contact the decompressed, flaccid ventricular wall during cardiac arrest.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.