ArticleAbdominal radiology (New York)2025
CT-based radiomics model for predicting perineural invasion status in gastric cancer.
Article in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Comparison of 2D and 3D measured iodine concentration of gastric adenocarcinoma on spectral-CT and their relationship with perineural invasion.BMC medical imaging · 2025Article
- Preoperative prediction value of 2.5D deep learning model based on contrast-enhanced CT for lymphovascular invasion of gastric cancer.Scientific reports · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
purposePerineural invasion (PNI) is an independent risk factor for poor prognosis in gastric cancer (GC) patients. This study aimed to develop and validate predictive models based on CT imaging and clinical features to predict PNI status in GC patients.
methodsThis retrospective study included 291 GC patients (229 in the training cohort and 62 in the validation cohort) who underwent gastrectomy between January 2020 and August 2022. The clinical data and preoperative abdominal contrast-enhanced computed tomography (CECT) images were collected. Radiomics features were extracted from the venous phase of CECT images. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), Pearson correlation coefficient, and t-test were applied for radiomics feature selection. The random forest algorithm was used to construct a radiomics signature and calculate the radiomics feature score (Rad-score). A hybrid model was built by aggregating the Rad-score and clinical predictors. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) were used to evaluate the prediction performance of the radiomics, clinical, and hybrid models.
resultsA total of 994 radiomics features were extracted from the venous phase images of each patient. Finally, 5 radiomics features were selected and used to construct a radiomics signature. The hybrid model demonstrated strong predictive ability for PNI, with AUCs of 0.833 (95% CI: 0.779-0.887) and 0.806 (95% CI: 0.628-0.983) in the training and validation cohorts, respectively. The DCA showed that the hybrid model had good clinical utility.
conclusionWe established three models, and the hybrid model that combined the Rad-score and clinical predictors had a high potential for predicting PNI in GC patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39503776What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.