Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39503752›Full record

ArticlePain2025

Comparative risk of mortality in new users of prescription opioids for noncancer pain: results from the International Pharmacosurveillance Study.

Meghna Jani, Nadyne Girard, David W Bates, David L Buckeridge, William G Dixon, Robyn Tamblyn

Abstract readMulticenter StudyComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Pain, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Meghna JaniCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research. The University of Manchester, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1487-277
Nadyne GirardDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, University of McGill, Montreal, QC, Canada.
David W BatesHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, United States.
David L BuckeridgeDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, University of McGill, Montreal, QC, Canada.
William G DixonCentre for Epidemiology Versus Arthritis, Centre for Musculoskeletal Research. The University of Manchester, UK.
Robyn TamblynDepartment of Epidemiology, Biostatistics, and Occupational Health, University of McGill, Montreal, QC, Canada.

Funding

CIHR CIHR MOP-111166National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR301413
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractAlthough opioids continue to be used internationally for noncancer pain, evidence to date on the comparative safety of different opioids is sparse and conflicting. The aim of this study was to examine the comparative risk of all-cause mortality in patients newly initiated on opioids for noncancer pain, across 3 jurisdictions in the United Kingdom (UK), United States, and Canada. A multicentre retrospective, population-based cohort study was conducted. Data sources included UK national primary care electronic health records (Clinical Practice Research Datalink), The Partners HealthCare Research Patient Data in Boston (US), and The Montreal Population Health Record data (Canada). New users of opioids aged ≥18 years without cancer were included. Patients with a diagnosis of a pain condition and with known back pain were analysed separately. Fully adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated using Cox-proportional models and adjusted for confounders. In total, 1,066,216 patients were included (UK: n = 993,294; Boston, US: n = 43,243; Montreal, Canada: n = 26,116). Compared with codeine, patients using morphine had a significantly higher adjusted risk in the UK {HR: 12.58 [95% confidence interval (CI), 11.87-13.32]}, US (HR: 8.62 [95% CI, 3.34-22.27]), and Canadian cohorts (HR: 6.69; [95% CI, 1.35-32.22]). In addition, other factors associated with higher mortality were being on combination opioids, fentanyl, buprenorphine, and oxycodone. Compared with those on <50 morphine milligram equivalents/day, patients on higher-doses experience an incremental increase in risk. In new users of opioids, compared with codeine, strong opioids, including morphine, fentanyl, buprenorphine, oxycodone, and combination opioids, and those on ≥50 morphine milligram equivalent/day were associated with a higher subsequent risk of all-cause mortality.

Indexed as

Analgesics, OpioidPainAdultAgedAged, 80 and overCanadaCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedRetrospective StudiesUnited KingdomUnited StatesYoung AdultAnalgesics, OpioidDeathsElectronic health recordsMortalityOpioid harmsOpioidsPharmacoepidemiology

Identifiers

PMID39503752
PMCPMC12004978

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.