ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2025
Integrated Deep Learning Model for the Detection, Segmentation, and Morphologic Analysis of Intracranial Aneurysms Using CT Angiography.
Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Differentiable centerline-aware framework for aneurysm neck delineation in volumetric angiography.NPJ digital medicine · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in neurovascular surgery: advancing diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Review
- Decision Support Systems in Neurosurgery: Current Applications and Future Directions.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Accuracy of segment anything model for classification of vascular stenosis in digital subtraction angiography.CVIR endovascular · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Purpose To develop a deep learning model for the morphologic measurement of unruptured intracranial aneurysms (UIAs) based on CT angiography (CTA) data and validate its performance using a multicenter dataset. Materials and Methods In this retrospective study, patients with CTA examinations, including those with and without UIAs, in a tertiary referral hospital from February 2018 to February 2021 were included as the training dataset. Patients with UIAs who underwent CTA at multiple centers between April 2021 and December 2022 were included as the multicenter external testing set. An integrated deep learning (IDL) model was developed for UIA detection, segmentation, and morphologic measurement using an nnU-Net algorithm. Model performance was evaluated using the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), with measurements by senior radiologists serving as the reference standard. The ability of the IDL model to improve performance of junior radiologists in measuring morphologic UIA features was assessed. Results The study included 1182 patients with UIAs and 578 controls without UIAs as the training dataset (median age, 55 years [IQR, 47-62 years], 1012 [57.5%] female) and 535 patients with UIAs as the multicenter external testing set (median age, 57 years [IQR, 50-63 years], 353 [66.0%] female). The IDL model achieved 97% accuracy in detecting UIAs and achieved a DSC of 0.90 (95% CI: 0.88, 0.92) for UIA segmentation. Model-based morphologic measurements showed good agreement with reference standard measurements (all ICCs > 0.85). Within the multicenter external testing set, the IDL model also showed agreement with reference standard measurements (all ICCs > 0.80). Junior radiologists assisted by the IDL model showed significantly improved performance in measuring UIA size (ICC improved from 0.88 [95% CI: 0.80, 0.92] to 0.96 [95% CI: 0.92, 0.97],
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.