ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2024
Evaluation of Fungitell (1,3)-β-D-glucan assay in tear samples for rapid diagnosis of fungal keratitis.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Fungal keratitis (FK) is a serious suppurative and ulcerative corneal infection leading to blindness and vision loss. Rapid diagnosis of FK can contribute to prompt clinical management with early recovery. The study aimed to standardize the detection of (1,3)-β-D-glucan (BDG) and establish the diagnostic cut-off concentration in tears of suspected FK patients along with non-infected controls. This prospective multicentric study was conducted between the period of August 2022 and April 2024. Samples were collected from three tertiary eye-care facilities across India. All suspected FK patients were enrolled in the study. Prior to tear collection, the eye and eyelid were gently cleansed using sterile normal saline (NS) and lint-free tissue paper. Subsequently, 50 µL of sterile NS was instilled into the eye, followed by tear sample collection after 60 s using sterile fine microtips. Tear samples were collected from the contralateral eyes of the FK patients, and those from healthy volunteers served as controls. The concentration of BDG in tears in varying dilutions was quantitatively measured using the Fungitell Assay Kit (Associates of Cape Cod, East Falmouth, Massachusetts). A total of 53 tear samples were analyzed at 1:10 and 1:20 dilutions. The receiver operating curve revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.919 for the 1:10 dilution, with a cut-off value of 123 pg/mL, yielding a sensitivity of 100% and specificity of 84.85%. The corresponding Youden Index was 0.798. At the 1:20 dilution, the AUC was 0.898 with a cut-off of 84 pg/mL, achieving a sensitivity of 70% and specificity of 96.88% with a Youden Index of 0.670. Given the higher specificity at the 1:20 dilution, it was further validated in 145 tear samples. The validation cohort demonstrated a sensitivity of 95.56%, specificity of 83%, positive predictive value (PPV) of 71.67%, negative predictive value (NPV) of 97.65%, and diagnostic odds ratio of 112.4. Notably, a significantly higher BDG concentration (
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.