ArticleThe Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism2025
Clinical and Radiological Features of Atypical Adrenal Masses-A Multicenter Retrospective Study.
Article in The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- An interpretable machine learning framework using multi-phase computed tomography for differentiation of adrenal lipid-poor adenomas and pheochromocytomas.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2026Article
- Adrenal cavernous lymphangioma successfully treated with robot-assisted laparoscopic adrenalectomy: a case description.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2025Article
- Clinical and Radiological Features of Atypical Adrenal Masses-A Multicenter Retrospective Study.The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
contextThe natural history and malignant potential of cases classified as atypical adrenal masses (AAMs) are unknown.
objectiveTo describe the radiological characteristics and clinical outcomes of AAMs. DESIGN AND
participantsA multicenter retrospective study. Patients ≥18 years old with AAMs [diameter of 10-39 mm on first imaging study and pre-contrast attenuation of >10 Hounsfield units (HU) on computed tomography] were studied. We excluded adrenal metastasis, pheochromocytoma, sarcoma, lymphoma, infiltrative lesions, and adrenal hemorrhage, as well as patients with genetic predisposition to adrenal neoplasms. Data are presented as percentages and median values with interquartile ranges (IQRs).
resultsWe included 217 patients with 224 adrenal masses (61.3% women); the median age was 58 years (IQR 49-65 years). The median size was 20.5 mm (IQR 15-27 mm), with a median precontrast attenuation of 23.5 HU (IQR 17-30 HU). The median AAM growth rate was 0.3 mm/year (IQR 0-1.8 mm/year). Seventy-one masses (31.7%) underwent pathological evaluation. Adrenal adenoma (n = 38; 17%) and adrenocortical carcinoma (ACC) (n = 25; 11.2%) were the 2 most common diagnoses. For the adenomas, the growth rate was 0.3 mm/year (IQR 0-2.3 mm/year) and for ACCs, the growth rate was 12.9 mm/year (IQR 3.5-22 mm/year). The absolute contrast washout was >60% in 5 out of 7 (71.4%) ACC cases. The best growth rate cutoff for predicting malignancy was 2.68 mm/year (area under the curve 0.939; sensitivity 87.5%, specificity 88.8%).
conclusionAAMs carry significant malignant potential, and long-term follow-up is warranted when surgery is not pursued. Contrast washout is not reliable in predicting malignant potential of AAMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.